Group Health Insurance (Level-Funded)—often called group level funding—is one of the fastest-growing strategies for small and mid-sized employers who want more cost control without taking on full self-funded risk. In simple terms, level-funded group health combines the predictable monthly billing structure of traditional fully insured plans with the transparency, reporting visibility, and potential premium refund opportunities typically associated with self-funded arrangements.

For employers facing annual renewal increases, unpredictable trend adjustments, or limited carrier flexibility, level-funded group health can create a more stable long-term budgeting framework. Many employers are drawn to level funding not just because of refund potential, but because it provides real claim visibility, stop-loss financial protection, and better alignment between actual employee health utilization and long-term employer cost outcomes.

If your company is evaluating ways to control healthcare spending while maintaining strong employee benefits, level-funded group health may represent a meaningful step forward. For business owners also evaluating risk protection strategies, many choose to coordinate benefit planning alongside broader protection planning like Key Person vs. Buy-Sell Life Insurance and Buy-Sell Life Insurance for Business.

—

Why Employers Are Moving Toward Level-Funded Group Health

Traditional fully insured health plans were designed to simplify administration by transferring all risk to the insurance carrier. While that simplicity remains attractive, many employers now realize they are paying premiums based on pooled regional risk rather than their own workforce health experience. Level-funded group health allows employers to participate more directly in the financial outcomes tied to their group’s actual claim performance.

Predictable monthly billing remains intact, but employers gain additional transparency into how healthcare dollars are actually being spent. Over time, this visibility can allow companies to make smarter plan design adjustments, wellness strategy decisions, and contribution structure updates.

For some employers, refund potential is the initial attraction. For others, long-term cost trend control and stop-loss financial protection are the primary drivers. The reality is that most successful level-funded programs combine all three benefits: cost stability, risk protection, and performance-based cost opportunities.

—

How Level-Funded Group Health Actually Works

Level-funded plans operate using a structured monthly payment that includes three primary cost components. The first is claims funding, which represents the projected cost of expected medical and pharmacy claims. The second is administrative cost, which covers network access, claims processing, compliance support, and customer service. The third is stop-loss insurance, which protects employers from catastrophic claim exposure beyond defined thresholds.

Throughout the year, claims are paid from the claims funding portion. If claims remain below projected expectations, unused claim funding may be eligible for surplus reconciliation at the end of the contract period. If claims exceed expected levels, stop-loss coverage helps limit employer exposure to predictable thresholds.

This structure allows employers to maintain fixed monthly cash flow while still gaining access to claim performance-based outcomes that do not exist in traditional fully insured plans.

—

Premium Refund Potential: What Employers Should Realistically Expect

Premium refunds in level-funded group health typically come in the form of surplus reconciliation. If total claims fall below projected funding targets and contract rules allow surplus distribution, employers may receive a refund or credit. However, surplus is never guaranteed and should be viewed as a possible performance outcome rather than a primary planning assumption.

Most experienced employers evaluate level-funded plans based on three financial scenarios: favorable claims year, average claims year, and high claims year. This modeling approach gives leadership clarity around both upside opportunities and worst-case financial exposure. Many employers ultimately select level funding because of improved cost predictability, even in years when no surplus is returned.

—

Small Group Eligibility and Participation Considerations

Level-funded plans have expanded dramatically in recent years. Many carriers now support groups as small as two enrolled employees, although eligibility varies by state and underwriting guidelines. Participation stability is often more important than group size when determining long-term program success.

Participation consistency helps underwriting models more accurately predict claims patterns. When participation fluctuates dramatically, claim predictability can decrease. This is why many level-funded programs include minimum participation thresholds and waiting period guidelines.

Some carriers allow inclusion of 1099 workers when eligibility requirements are met. Because eligibility rules vary by carrier and state, it is important to evaluate group structure carefully during quoting.

—

—

Plan Design Flexibility and Employee Experience

Level-funded group health plans support many of the same benefit structures employees expect from traditional group coverage. Broad PPO networks, EPO network options, preventive care coverage, virtual care access, pharmacy programs, and wellness incentive structures are commonly available. Many employers pair high deductible health plans with HSAs or integrate HRAs to help offset employee out-of-pocket exposure.

Virtual care utilization continues to play a major role in claim cost stabilization. Early access to telemedicine, behavioral health resources, and chronic care coaching can help reduce avoidable emergency and specialty care costs. Over time, these engagement tools can meaningfully influence long-term claim performance trends.

—

Stop-Loss Insurance: The Backbone of Financial Protection

Stop-loss insurance is a critical component of level-funded plan design. Specific stop-loss protects against large individual claims, while aggregate stop-loss protects against total claim exposure exceeding projected annual limits. Together, these protections allow employers to benefit from performance-based claim outcomes while still maintaining predictable financial guardrails.

For many employers, stop-loss protection is actually more valuable than refund potential because it stabilizes worst-case financial exposure. Over time, strong stop-loss structures often create more consistent long-term budgeting than traditional fully insured renewal volatility.

—

Strategies That May Improve Long-Term Cost Performance

Employers who actively promote preventive care utilization often see stronger long-term claim outcomes. Early screening, chronic condition management, and primary care engagement can help prevent higher-cost acute events. Pharmacy optimization strategies, including generic substitution and specialty pharmacy management, can also help stabilize cost trends.

Employee education plays a major role in claim cost outcomes. Employees who understand where to access appropriate levels of care often generate lower overall claim cost trends without sacrificing care quality.

—

—

Why Many Employers View Level Funding as a Long-Term Strategy

Level funding allows employers to move away from purely pooled risk models and toward performance-informed benefit planning. Over time, access to claim reporting allows employers to make smarter plan design decisions that support both employee health and employer cost control.

Many employers who transition to level funding remain there long term because it provides a balance of predictability, flexibility, and performance-based cost alignment.

—