Calculate Your Guaranteed Retirement Income

Estimate lifetime payouts from top carriers using our income calculator below.

View Current Fixed Rates

Prefer a custom illustration?

Request an annuity quote.

Lifetime Income Calculator

💡 Note: The calculator accepts premiums up to $2,000,000. If you’re investing more, results increase in direct proportion — for example, doubling your premium roughly doubles the guaranteed income at the same age and options.

Ensure you are receiving the absolute top rates

When This Strategy Makes Sense

This approach is most commonly used when your goal is to create a “personal pension” that covers needs-based spending and reduces reliance on portfolio withdrawals during volatile years. Many people choose it as a replacement for the stable paycheck they lose when work income ends. Instead of wondering whether your retirement assets can safely support withdrawals for 25–35 years, you can allocate a portion of savings to a contract that promises lifetime income under defined rules.

It can also be a fit if you’re trying to reduce the stress of timing risk. If markets are strong early in retirement, portfolio withdrawals feel easy. If markets are weak, the same strategy can feel like a fight. A guaranteed income rider can reduce the pressure to sell assets during down markets, because you have a stable income stream that isn’t dependent on market returns for the payment to continue (as long as rider rules are followed).

Another practical reason people choose this strategy is spousal protection. Joint-life income riders are often available and are designed to keep income flowing as long as either spouse is living. That can help protect the surviving spouse from a sudden income shortfall and can make budgeting more predictable. The trade-off is that joint payouts may be lower than single-life payouts, but many households view that trade-off as worth it for the security of income continuation.

How Payouts Are Determined

The income amount you can guarantee depends on several variables that work together. The first is age at income start. In most rider schedules, payout factors increase with age, because the insurer expects to pay for fewer years on average. That means delaying income (even a few years) can raise the payout factor and create higher guaranteed income, though delaying also means you need another resource to cover spending during the deferral years.

The second variable is the rider’s benefit-base growth provisions. Some riders offer roll-up growth during deferral, which can be simple or compound, and some offer step-ups that lock in market-linked growth if the account value hits a new high at anniversary. Some offer bonuses to the benefit base. In many contracts, those benefits come with rider fees and contract trade-offs. The practical takeaway is that you want to compare riders based on their total structure: how the base grows, when and how step-ups are measured, how income is calculated, and how fees are applied.

The third variable is whether the income is single-life or joint-life. Joint-life income is designed to cover both lifetimes and often pays until the second death. Because the insurer expects to pay longer on average, joint payout factors can be lower, but the continuity can be valuable for couples who want a simple retirement paycheck plan that lasts no matter which spouse lives longer.

Finally, state and carrier rules matter. Availability, rider options, fee calculations, roll-up schedules, and payout factors vary across insurers and by state. That’s one reason it’s difficult to make a smart decision based only on a single illustration or a single carrier’s marketing. This is also why many clients start by viewing broader market context using our current annuity rates page and then use the income calculator on this page to narrow down what looks best for their age and premium level.

Account Value vs Benefit Base

One of the most important concepts to understand is the difference between your account value and the benefit base. The account value is your actual accumulation value inside the annuity. It grows by interest credits (based on the index formula or fixed bucket if offered), and it can be reduced by withdrawals, rider fees, and contract charges. The benefit base is typically a ledger used only to calculate income. You generally cannot cash out the benefit base as a lump sum. It exists to determine the guaranteed withdrawal amount when you start income.

This is where confusion happens: people see a benefit base that grew aggressively during deferral and assume that means their account value is that large. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t. The benefit base is not “fake,” but it is not the same as cash value. It’s a tool to calculate income. A well-designed income plan should review both values and understand how withdrawals and fees may impact each.

Index Crediting Basics (Caps, Spreads, Participation)

Fixed indexed annuity growth is formula-based, which is why understanding caps, spreads, and participation rates matters. A cap sets a ceiling on credited interest for the segment. If the index gains more than the cap, the credited interest is limited to the cap. A participation rate determines what portion of the index gain is credited. A spread reduces the index gain by a set amount before crediting interest. Different carriers use different structures and may offer multiple strategies inside the same contract.

For income planning, the point is not to chase the “best” cap in a snapshot. The real question is whether the contract and rider combination creates the income outcome you want, with reasonable liquidity, clear rules, and a structure you’ll be comfortable holding through the surrender period. It can be helpful to compare the broader “annuity mechanics” in other resources as you decide. If you’re sorting through common misunderstandings, you may also like fixed indexed annuity myths debunked for a cleaner framework when evaluating product claims and expectations.

Income Rider Fees and How They’re Charged

Most income riders charge an annual fee, but how the fee is calculated matters. Some riders charge a percentage of the account value. Others charge a percentage of the benefit base. The fee might be deducted monthly, quarterly, or annually depending on the contract. In practice, fees typically reduce account value growth because they are deducted from the accumulation value, even when the benefit base keeps growing by roll-up rules.

This is not necessarily a problem—fees are how the insurer funds the income guarantee. The question is whether the trade-off makes sense for your goals. If you truly want lifetime income you can count on, paying for a guarantee may be reasonable. If your priority is accumulation, you may be better served by an FIA without an income rider, a fixed-rate strategy, or a different structure entirely. Many people evaluate this by looking at the projected payout level they can lock in and comparing it to other income sources.

Liquidity Rules and Free Withdrawal Provisions

Fixed indexed annuities are long-term contracts, and most have surrender schedules, often in the 5–10 year range. Many contracts also include free withdrawal provisions, commonly around 10% per year (though this can vary). Withdrawals beyond the free amount may incur surrender charges and could also trigger a market value adjustment (MVA) depending on contract design and timing.

If you add an income rider, liquidity becomes even more important because the rider has withdrawal rules you must follow to maintain the guaranteed income amount. If you exceed the rider’s allowed withdrawal schedule, you may reduce the benefit base, reduce the guaranteed payout, or in some cases forfeit rider benefits. This is why we typically plan for this kind of annuity only with money you can comfortably commit for the surrender window, while keeping emergency funds and short-term spending needs in more liquid accounts.

If you want a deeper look at withdrawal behavior and annuity contract rules, you may also find these related resources helpful for broader context: annuity free withdrawal rules and annuity beneficiary death benefits, which can help clarify common questions about liquidity, access, and what happens when the contract owner passes away.

What Happens If the Account Value Hits Zero?

This is one of the reasons people like income riders. If you follow the rider withdrawal rules, the lifetime income is designed to continue even if the account value is depleted over time. In other words, the guarantee is not based on the account value remaining positive—it’s based on the rider’s contractual promise. That guarantee is backed by the insurer’s claims-paying ability, which is why carrier quality and product selection matter.

It’s also important to understand that reaching zero account value is not the “goal.” It can happen if withdrawals are taken for many years and index credits are low or rider fees are high relative to growth. The real goal is to secure dependable income and reduce uncertainty. The “zero value” scenario simply explains why these riders can create comfort: the income stream can keep paying even in unfavorable long-run crediting conditions, as long as the contract is managed correctly.

RMD Coordination for Qualified Money

Many people use annuities for IRA and qualified money via rollovers. Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) can complicate retirement income planning if the annuity rider rules don’t coordinate well with distribution requirements. Many modern income riders include provisions that allow RMD withdrawals without the same negative impact to the benefit base, but rules vary and must be confirmed on the specific contract and state form.

If RMDs will apply to your situation, the best approach is to design the annuity plan around the distribution schedule and confirm how the rider treats those withdrawals. In many households, the annuity income start date is coordinated with Social Security timing, and RMD management is layered into that plan so withdrawals remain efficient and predictable.

Comparing a Rider vs Annuitization

Some people compare a rider-based strategy with annuitization. Annuitization typically converts a lump sum into a stream of payments from the insurer, often with limited or no access to the remaining principal depending on the payout option chosen. A rider strategy is different: it generally preserves an account value that can be accessed (subject to surrender charges and rider rules), while still providing a contractual income benefit. That flexibility is one reason many retirees prefer riders over annuitization, even though annuitization can sometimes produce strong payout levels depending on age and product.

If your priority is “highest possible guaranteed income,” annuitization might be worth exploring. If your priority is “guaranteed income with flexibility,” a rider structure may feel more comfortable. The best option depends on your household’s need for liquidity, your time horizon, and whether you want to preserve a potential death benefit.

Real-World Examples

Case #1 – Bridge-to-Retirement: A 62-year-old rolled $350,000 from a 401(k) into an FIA with an income rider and planned to start income at 67. During the deferral period, the rider’s benefit base grew based on its contract provisions, helping increase the guaranteed payout factor once income began. The goal wasn’t to “win the market.” The goal was to create a dependable paycheck that complemented Social Security and reduced pressure on other retirement accounts during early retirement.

Case #2 – Spousal Continuation: A couple (65/63) wanted joint lifetime income that could help cover essential expenses no matter which spouse lived longer. A joint-life rider provided guaranteed monthly income for as long as either spouse was living, creating predictable cash flow for housing, utilities, and baseline healthcare. Their plan prioritized income continuity and simplicity, even though joint-life payout factors were slightly lower than single-life options.

Case #3 – “Income Floor + Growth Potential” Split: A household allocated part of retirement savings to a rider-based FIA for guaranteed lifetime income and kept another portion in a more growth-oriented bucket. The intent was to cover needs-based spending through guaranteed income sources while giving the remaining portfolio more flexibility. This kind of split approach is common when retirees want both stability and growth, and it often becomes clearer when the household can see income estimates side-by-side using the calculator on this page.

Pros and Considerations

The most common advantage of an FIA with an income rider is the ability to create a predictable paycheck that is contractually defined. People like the principal protection, the simplicity of a known income floor, and the option to coordinate the start date with other retirement income sources. For many households, that alone is worth the trade-offs, because it reduces financial anxiety and makes retirement spending decisions easier.

The trade-offs are real. Income riders typically have fees. The annuity has surrender schedules and liquidity constraints. Index crediting is formula-based, which means upside is limited compared to direct investing in strong markets. Some riders also include strict rules about how and when you can take withdrawals. None of those are inherently bad, but they mean the strategy works best when you are intentionally using it for income planning and not treating it like a liquid savings account.

If you want to compare “safe money” options more broadly before you commit to a rider plan, review our current annuity rates page for a high-level view of what’s available in the fixed annuity marketplace, then return here to compare guaranteed income estimates using the calculator.