What Should I do with my IRA after I Retire?
What Should I do with my IRA after I Retire?
Jason Stolz CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
Retirement changes everything about how you relate to your IRA. During your working years, the IRA was an accumulation engine — you contributed, it grew, and the goal was a larger balance at the end of each year. After retirement, the IRA becomes a distribution engine, and that shift changes the math entirely. Now withdrawals, taxes, RMD rules, longevity risk, and market cycles all interact at the same time. A portfolio structure that felt comfortable during accumulation can feel precarious the moment you start living off it — especially if markets drop early in retirement or if required distributions force taxable income at the wrong time. The four questions every IRA retiree eventually faces are: how do I create income that lasts, how do I keep taxes manageable, how do I protect the account from a major market event during the most vulnerable years, and how do I keep the plan simple enough to maintain without constant stress. At Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA helps retirees nationwide build IRA distribution strategies that address all four — coordinating withdrawal plans, principal-protected income structures, tax-efficient distribution timing, and beneficiary planning so the IRA supports the retirement, not the reverse. Our resource on how an IRA works covers the structural rules that govern distributions, required minimums, and titling — essential context before choosing a retirement distribution strategy.
The most common IRA retirement planning mistake is not choosing the wrong investment. It is failing to define what role the IRA plays in the retirement income plan before making investment or distribution decisions. An IRA that is expected to be the primary income source, the emergency reserve, the growth engine, and the legacy account simultaneously cannot perform all those functions well simultaneously — particularly when a market drawdown or unexpected expense occurs and competing demands are placed on the same account at the same time. Assigning the IRA a specific, clearly defined role — and sizing that role appropriately relative to other assets and income sources — is the structural decision that makes the IRA function as a retirement asset rather than a retirement liability. Our resource on how much income you need in retirement covers the income-needs analysis that anchors the IRA role definition in real numbers rather than intuition.
Ensure you are receiving the absolute top rates
Current Fixed Annuity Rates
Compare today’s best fixed annuity rates from top carriers.
Current Bonus Annuity Rates
See which annuities offer the highest upfront bonus today.
Request an Annuity Quote
Submit our annuity request form to get personalized rate options.
Lifetime Income Calculator
Use our calculator to see how much guaranteed income your IRA can generate — based on your age, premium amount, and income start date.
IRA Retirement Income Options — Comparison by Situation and Goal
The right strategy for your IRA after retirement depends on what you need the IRA to do in the context of your full financial picture. A retiree with a pension and Social Security covering all essential expenses has fundamentally different options from a retiree whose IRA is the primary income source. The table below maps common retirement situations to the most appropriate IRA distribution or repositioning approach — so the decision connects to your actual circumstances rather than a generic guideline.
| Your Situation / Primary Goal | Recommended Approach | Primary Benefit | Main Trade-off | Watch Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRA is primary income source — essential expenses must be covered SS and pension do not cover all monthly needs; IRA withdrawals fund housing, food, healthcare |
Reposition a portion to guaranteed lifetime income (fixed or indexed annuity with GLWB rider); keep remainder in accessible, diversified investments for growth and flexibility | Essential expenses covered by contract guarantee — independent of market performance; reduces forced withdrawals in down markets | The income portion is less liquid during the surrender period; annuity income is taxable as ordinary income from an IRA | Size the annuity to cover true essential expenses, not total lifestyle spending — over-annuitizing reduces flexibility for irregular needs |
| Sufficient guaranteed income from pension and SS — IRA is supplemental Essential expenses already covered; IRA is for lifestyle, travel, healthcare events, legacy |
Keep IRA invested in a diversified portfolio; systematic withdrawal plan for lifestyle spending; coordinate RMDs with portfolio withdrawals | Maximum growth potential; full flexibility for irregular spending; no surrender period limitations; easiest to manage when income pressure is low | Full market exposure; a major early-retirement drawdown reduces the account’s long-term growth capacity even when income pressure is low | Maintain a 12–24 month cash reserve so a down market does not force IRA liquidation at depressed prices even with supplemental status |
| Market volatility stress — IRA declines feel threatening even if income is technically covered Cannot sleep well when market drops; behavioral risk of panic selling is real |
Partial repositioning to fixed indexed annuity for principal protection — index upside with zero-loss floor; separates the “protected” bucket from the “growth” bucket emotionally and financially | Principal is protected from direct index losses; reduces emotional volatility that leads to panic decisions; allows growth assets to remain invested without triggering fear-based selling | Index upside is limited by cap, spread, or participation rate; surrender period applies to the protected portion; lower liquidity than market accounts | Understand how the crediting formula limits upside before purchasing — the floor at zero is guaranteed but does not mean full index participation in up years |
| Tax management priority — RMDs and large distributions are creating avoidable tax problems IRA balance is large enough that RMDs push income into higher brackets or affect Medicare premiums |
Strategic Roth conversion in low-income years before RMDs begin; consider QLAC (qualified longevity annuity contract) to defer a portion of RMDs; coordinate withdrawal timing with Social Security and other taxable income | Reduces future RMD amounts by converting to Roth; lowers IRMAA exposure; spreads income recognition over years of lower marginal rates | Roth conversions are taxable in the year executed — must be sized carefully relative to current-year marginal rate; QLAC reduces liquidity for the deferred portion | Do not convert more Roth than the current-year marginal rate makes advantageous; work with a tax advisor to model multi-year conversion scenarios before executing |
| Legacy priority — want to pass remaining IRA to heirs efficiently IRA expected to have meaningful balance at death; beneficiary planning matters |
Named beneficiary designations must be current and correct (supersede a will); consider Roth conversion for heirs who will be in high tax brackets; evaluate stretch options under current SECURE 2.0 rules; coordinate with trust or estate plan if applicable | Beneficiary-designated IRA passes outside probate; Roth assets inherited by heirs are tax-free qualified distributions during the 10-year post-death distribution period | Non-spouse beneficiaries typically must distribute inherited IRA within 10 years under SECURE 2.0; this may create large taxable income years for heirs in high brackets | Beneficiary designation errors are among the most costly and irreversible IRA mistakes — verify designations annually and after any life event (marriage, divorce, death of a named beneficiary) |
| Longevity concern — worried about outliving IRA assets if retirement lasts 25–35 years Good family health history; retirement could last much longer than expected |
Lifetime income annuity for essential expense base; allow growth assets maximum time horizon; coordinate Social Security delay (if not yet claimed) to maximize the lifetime benefit that functions as longevity insurance | Guaranteed income eliminates longevity risk for essential expenses — income continues regardless of how long you live or what the market does; allows other assets to stay invested without withdrawal pressure | Income locked in at current rates; if inflation is higher than expected long-term, fixed income loses purchasing power without a COLA rider | Consider a COLA rider on the income structure for long-life scenarios; compare joint vs. single-life payout options if a surviving spouse’s income security matters |
| Multiple account types — coordinating IRA with 401k rollover, Roth, or other accounts Different accounts with different tax treatments; want coordinated withdrawals |
Withdrawal sequence matters: typically draw from taxable accounts first, then Traditional IRA/pre-tax, then Roth last (for tax-free growth); coordinate to fill lower tax brackets before RMD age; consider consolidating IRAs for simpler management | Optimal withdrawal sequence can meaningfully reduce lifetime tax paid; coordination between account types reduces the risk of avoidably large taxable income years | Complexity increases with more account types; requires annual review as income sources, balances, and tax rules change | Do not apply a single withdrawal sequence rule universally — the optimal sequence depends on your specific marginal rate situation, Social Security timing, and projected Roth conversion windows |
The table’s most consequential row for most IRA retirees is the first — when the IRA is the primary income source and essential expenses must be covered by withdrawals. That is the scenario where market volatility is most directly dangerous, where a major early-retirement drawdown creates the most permanent damage to the income plan, and where the structure of the withdrawal approach matters most. Our resource on sequence of returns risk covers the mathematics of why early-retirement market declines are permanently more damaging than late-retirement declines — and why eliminating market dependency for the essential expense layer is the specific risk management action that protects the IRA’s long-term sustainability most effectively. Our resource on how retirement accounts are taxed covers the tax treatment framework for IRA distributions — the ordinary income tax, RMD rules, and potential IRMAA interaction that affect the net income the IRA actually delivers after taxes.
Why IRA Decisions After Retirement Are Permanently Consequential
Before retirement, IRA decisions have a second chance. A bad investment choice during accumulation can recover over time because contributions continue, compounding continues, and time remains in the account’s future. After retirement, the margin for error narrows significantly. Withdrawals are occurring simultaneously with any market loss — meaning the IRA sells positions at depressed prices to fund the withdrawal, permanently reducing the portfolio’s ability to participate in the recovery. A retiree who withdraws 5% from an IRA in the same year the account drops 25% has a far more difficult recovery trajectory than a retiree who simply held through the same decline without withdrawing. This dynamic — the interaction of withdrawals with market volatility — is what makes the early years of retirement the most financially sensitive period of the entire retirement account lifecycle.
The sustainable withdrawal question matters enormously in this context. The traditional 4% guideline was designed to give a 30-year retirement a reasonable probability of success across historical market sequences — but it does not guarantee success in all sequences, and it does not account for the specific risk profile of IRA retirees whose accounts contain all pre-tax dollars subject to ordinary income tax on every distribution. Our resource on what is the 4% rule covers the guideline’s origin, its limitations, and when it is and is not an appropriate planning anchor for specific retirement situations. Our resource on annuity payout calculator provides the practical estimation tool for understanding what guaranteed income a given IRA amount can generate — useful context for comparing the annuity income approach against the systematic withdrawal approach in concrete dollar terms.
Confirming What You Have Before Deciding What to Do With It
Many retirees approach the “what should I do with my IRA” question before fully understanding what is inside the IRA from a tax and sourcing perspective. A Traditional IRA can contain entirely pre-tax contributions, entirely after-tax (non-deductible) contributions, rollover assets from multiple employer plans, or a combination of all three. The tax treatment of distributions differs meaningfully between these sources — after-tax contributions have a “basis” that is not taxable on distribution, while pre-tax and employer rollover contributions are fully taxable. If the IRA contains any non-deductible contribution basis (tracked via IRS Form 8606), that basis proportion must be applied to all distributions proportionally across all Traditional IRA accounts, not just the account that contains the original non-deductible contributions.
Before choosing a distribution strategy, confirm the IRA’s source composition, whether any Form 8606 basis exists, whether consolidating multiple IRA accounts would simplify the management, and whether the IRA custodian’s distribution processing capabilities align with the planned withdrawal structure. For IRA retirees who are considering repositioning some or all of the IRA into a guaranteed income structure, the transfer process must be handled as a direct, trustee-to-trustee movement to preserve the IRA’s tax-deferred status — a process covered in detail on the IRA transfer page listed in the Related Resources panel below.
Option 1 — Keep Invested and Take Systematic Withdrawals
Keeping the IRA invested and taking systematic withdrawals — monthly, quarterly, or annually — is the most common IRA retirement approach and can work effectively when the retiree has sufficient assets, a disciplined spending structure, and the emotional ability to maintain the withdrawal plan without panic-selling during market downturns. The approach works best when the IRA is not the sole income source and when the retiree has enough liquidity outside the IRA to avoid forced selling during a market decline. It works most poorly when every monthly bill depends on that year’s investment performance — because the structural interaction between withdrawals and volatility (sequence of returns risk) means that a bad market sequence in the first few years of retirement can permanently damage the account’s sustainability even if long-term average returns are adequate.
The systematic withdrawal approach can be meaningfully improved by separating the IRA’s role from the emergency reserve, creating a defined cash buffer (1–2 years of expected withdrawals held in stable, accessible vehicles outside the main investment portfolio), and establishing a written policy for how withdrawals are adjusted in years when the portfolio declines significantly. A retiree who has a plan for market down years — “if the portfolio declines more than 15%, I will reduce discretionary withdrawals by 20% for 12 months” — is far more likely to maintain the strategy than a retiree who has no defined response protocol and defaults to emotional reactions at the worst possible moments.
Option 2 — Reposition Part of the IRA Into Principal-Protected Income
Repositioning a portion of the IRA into a principal-protected annuity structure is the approach that most directly addresses sequence of returns risk for retirees whose essential expenses depend on IRA withdrawals. The principle is simple: remove the portion of the IRA that is responsible for non-negotiable monthly expenses from market exposure, guarantee that portion’s income production contractually, and allow the remaining IRA assets to remain invested for growth without the pressure of funding essential expenses every month. This structural separation — often called the “income floor plus upside” approach — is the retirement planning framework that best manages the dual risks of market volatility and longevity in a single design.
For retirees evaluating this approach, our resource on guaranteed income from annuities covers how fixed and indexed annuities convert IRA assets into income streams with different design features and trade-offs. Our resource on what is a GLWB covers the guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit mechanics in plain English — the income base, rollup rate, payout rate, and rider fee interaction that determines how much guaranteed income a given IRA amount produces for life. Our resource on are annuities worth it provides the balanced evaluation framework for assessing whether the income certainty an annuity provides is worth the trade-offs in liquidity, upside participation, and ongoing rider costs for the specific retirement situation. Our resource on best annuity for a 65-year-old covers the age-specific carrier and product comparison that is most relevant to the typical IRA retiree evaluating this repositioning approach — at the age when both income needs and product availability align most favorably.
Option 3 — Create a Guaranteed Lifetime Income Floor
A pension-like income floor is the retirement structure that most directly eliminates longevity risk — the risk of outliving assets — from the retirement income plan. Social Security already provides one layer of lifetime income. The question is whether that layer, combined with any other guaranteed sources, fully covers essential monthly expenses or whether a gap exists that must be funded by IRA withdrawals that are vulnerable to market conditions and sequence risk. When a gap exists, converting a portion of the IRA into a second guaranteed income stream — through a lifetime annuity or a deferred income structure — creates the same psychological and financial security that a pension provides: the income continues regardless of market conditions, regardless of account value, and regardless of how long retirement lasts. Our resource on how Social Security and annuities work together covers the income coordination framework that shows how the two lifetime income sources complement each other — and how sizing the annuity income to fill the specific gap between Social Security income and essential expense coverage produces the most efficient use of the IRA assets repositioned.
For retirees thinking about this approach in the context of a replacement for the pension income they never had, our resource on pension replacement — turning savings into guaranteed lifetime income covers the full design framework for building a personal pension from IRA assets. The annuity staging concept — deferring income activation to a future date to allow the income base to grow at a rollup rate before income begins — is also directly relevant. Our resource on laddering annuities covers the strategy of using multiple annuity contracts with staggered income start dates to create rising income in later retirement years when healthcare and care costs tend to increase.
Option 4 — Build a Hybrid IRA Retirement Plan
The hybrid approach assigns different portions of the IRA to different roles rather than forcing the entire account to serve all retirement purposes simultaneously. In a hybrid design, one portion provides the guaranteed income floor (principal-protected annuity with income feature), another portion remains invested in diversified market-based assets for growth and inflation protection, and a cash reserve sits outside both to handle irregular expenses without requiring either the annuity or the investment portfolio to be disturbed on short notice. This three-bucket structure is the most resilient IRA retirement design for retirees who want both income certainty and long-term growth potential — because each dollar is assigned to the job it is best suited for rather than every dollar being asked to do everything.
The sizing decisions within a hybrid structure require honest answers to the questions: how much monthly guaranteed income do I actually need beyond Social Security, how long could I genuinely tolerate a 30% portfolio decline without changing my lifestyle, and how much irregular spending do I realistically anticipate over the next 5–10 years. The answers determine how much IRA goes to the income bucket, how much goes to the growth bucket, and how much stays liquid as the working capital reserve. Our resource on annuity free withdrawal rules covers how the liquid access provisions built into most annuity contracts allow the income bucket to maintain some liquidity — typically 10% of the account value annually without surrender charges — even within the surrender period structure.
RMD Planning — Building the Distribution Schedule Before It’s Mandatory
Required minimum distributions from Traditional IRAs are mandatory, taxable, and tied to a schedule that does not respond to market conditions or your liquidity preference. Once you reach the applicable RMD age (currently 73 under SECURE 2.0 provisions), distributions must occur on schedule whether the market is favorable or not, whether you need the income or not, and whether the distribution pushes you into a higher marginal bracket or affects Medicare IRMAA thresholds. Retirees who plan for RMDs prospectively — building the distribution schedule into the IRA retirement plan before the first mandatory year — avoid the tax and income surprises that catch unprepared retirees off guard.
The most effective RMD planning approach coordinates the mandatory distribution amount with the rest of the retirement income plan — sizing voluntary withdrawals in years before the mandatory start date to smooth the income trajectory, considering Roth conversions during low-income years to reduce the future Traditional IRA balance subject to RMDs, and positioning annuity income features to naturally produce distribution amounts that satisfy or contribute to the annual RMD obligation. Our resource on Roth conversion windows explained covers the specific planning periods — typically the years between retirement and the start of Social Security or RMDs — when income is lowest and Roth conversions are most tax-efficient.
Tax Coordination — The IRA Decision That Most Retirees Make Last
Tax management is the IRA retirement planning dimension that most retirees address last — often because it feels complex and because the urgency is less immediate than the income question. But the cumulative lifetime tax impact of IRA distribution timing and sequencing can amount to tens of thousands of dollars over a 20–30 year retirement, and the decisions that produce the most favorable outcomes must be made before the window closes. Our resource on how retirement accounts are taxed provides the foundational tax framework for Traditional IRA distributions, the ordinary income tax treatment that applies to all pre-tax IRA withdrawals, the RMD rules that force distributions on a mandatory schedule, and the IRMAA interaction that can increase Medicare Part B and D premiums when IRA distributions push income above threshold levels. This resource is the practical starting point for understanding why coordinating IRA distribution timing with other taxable income sources — Social Security, pensions, investment income — matters as much as the investment or annuity strategy decision itself.
For retirees with a SIMPLE IRA alongside a Traditional IRA, the distribution coordination question extends across both account types, with specific SIMPLE IRA rules that can differ from Traditional IRA mechanics. Our resource on what should I do with my SIMPLE IRA after I retire covers the SIMPLE IRA-specific retirement distribution framework as a companion to this guide. For retirees whose retirement income plan needs to reflect the overall picture across multiple account types, our resource on how much income I need in retirement provides the income needs analysis that grounds the multi-account coordination in real numbers rather than estimates.
Get an IRA Retirement Strategy Review
We help retirees define the IRA’s role in the retirement income plan, compare principal-protected income options across 100+ carriers, and coordinate distributions with RMD rules and tax planning so retirement cash flow feels steady and sustainable.
Request an IRA Strategy ReviewRelated Retirement Planning Pages
IRA sustainability analysis, transfer mechanics, RMD planning, annuitization strategy, rollover guidance, and tax-deferred positioning resources.
Financial Protection Essentials
Companion retirement account guides for the most common account types alongside the IRA — 401k, 403b, pension, Roth IRA, SEP IRA, and short-term annuity options for retirees evaluating flexibility.
Talk With an Advisor Today
Choose how you’d like to connect—call or message us, then book a time that works for you.
Schedule here:
calendly.com/jason-dibcompanies/diversified-quotes
Licensed in all 50 states • Fiduciary, family-owned since 1980
FAQs: What Should I Do With My IRA After I Retire?
Can I leave my IRA where it is after I retire?
Yes — there is no rule requiring you to move, consolidate, or restructure your IRA at retirement. The IRA can remain at its current custodian, invested in the same assets, with no changes required. Whether leaving it in place is the right decision depends on what the IRA is doing relative to your retirement income needs. If you have sufficient guaranteed income from other sources — Social Security, pension, other guaranteed streams — and the IRA serves a supplemental or legacy role, keeping it invested at the current custodian may be entirely appropriate. If the IRA is the primary income source and monthly expenses depend on its performance, leaving it fully exposed to market volatility without a structured withdrawal plan or a protected income component introduces sequence of returns risk that can permanently damage the account’s sustainability during a bad early-retirement market sequence. The question is not whether you can leave it in place — you can — but whether leaving it in place with its current structure serves the retirement income objective you actually have.
Is rolling my IRA into an annuity taxable?
No — a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer from a Traditional IRA to an IRA-qualified annuity is not a taxable event. The transfer preserves the IRA’s tax-deferred status because funds move directly from the current custodian to the receiving annuity carrier without passing through the account owner’s possession. No mandatory withholding applies, no 60-day redeposit deadline is triggered, and no ordinary income tax is assessed on the transferred amount. The taxable events occur later — when distributions are taken from the IRA annuity during retirement, those distributions are subject to ordinary income tax in the year received, exactly as any Traditional IRA distribution would be regardless of whether the IRA is held in an annuity or in a brokerage account. The annuity wrapper does not change the tax character of IRA assets; it changes the structure, predictability, and guarantee features available for managing those assets during the distribution phase. The key to a clean transfer is ensuring the movement of funds is processed as a direct transfer — not as a distribution to the account owner followed by a redeposit — which eliminates all withholding and timing risks from the transaction.
Does an annuity eliminate required minimum distributions?
No — holding IRA assets in an annuity does not eliminate the RMD requirement. Required minimum distributions apply to all Traditional IRA assets regardless of whether they are held in a standard brokerage account, a fixed annuity, a fixed indexed annuity, or any other investment vehicle. The RMD calculation is based on the fair market value of the annuity as reported by the carrier at year-end and the applicable IRS life expectancy factor for the account owner’s age. What an IRA annuity can do is make the RMD more manageable and more predictable. For accumulation-phase annuities, most carriers permit the annual RMD to be taken under the free withdrawal provision without surrender charges as long as it falls within the 10% annual free withdrawal allowance. For income rider designs where the annuity is already making guaranteed income payments, those income payments may satisfy part or all of the annual RMD obligation depending on the income payment amount relative to the calculated RMD. Confirming how the specific annuity contract handles RMDs — through systematic withdrawal options, income payment integration, or contract-specific RMD endorsements — is part of the pre-transfer analysis that should happen before any IRA is repositioned into an annuity structure.
Can I create guaranteed lifetime income from my IRA?
Yes — this is one of the most practically powerful uses of IRA assets in retirement. A guaranteed lifetime income structure using IRA funds converts a portion of the pre-tax IRA balance into an income stream that continues for as long as the annuity owner lives — regardless of account value, market performance, or how long the retirement lasts. This is the private pension equivalent for retirees who do not have access to traditional defined benefit pension income. The mechanics involve transferring a portion of the IRA to an IRA-qualified annuity with a guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit rider (for deferred income) or to a single premium immediate annuity (for income beginning within the first year). The income produced is subject to ordinary income tax as distributions from a Traditional IRA — the guarantee is on the pre-tax amount, and the tax is paid as income is received over the lifetime of the payments. Sizing the guaranteed income to cover the gap between Social Security income and essential monthly expenses is the typical design goal — creating the income floor that makes the retirement plan resilient regardless of market conditions. The income calculator on this page provides the practical starting point for estimating what a given IRA balance can produce as guaranteed lifetime income at different ages.
Should I convert part of my IRA to a Roth?
A Roth conversion may be beneficial depending on the timing and the tax rate differential between now and the expected future rate during the years when the converted assets would be distributed. The core question is: are you in a lower marginal tax bracket now than you will be when RMDs begin? If yes — typically during the years between retirement and the start of Social Security or mandatory RMD distributions — converting a portion of the Traditional IRA to Roth and paying taxes now at a lower rate preserves those assets from future higher-rate taxation. Roth assets have no RMD requirements during the original owner’s lifetime, which means they can continue growing tax-free without mandatory distribution pressure, and they can be inherited by beneficiaries who distribute them tax-free over a 10-year window. The caution is that Roth conversions are taxable in the year executed — the converted amount is added to ordinary income for that year — and poorly timed conversions can push income into higher brackets, affect Social Security taxation, or trigger Medicare IRMAA surcharges. Converting during a year when income is already elevated by a large RMD or an unusual distribution is generally counterproductive. Our resource on Roth conversion windows covers the specific low-income planning periods when conversions are most tax-efficient and the size limits that prevent bracket-creep from reducing the conversion’s net benefit.
How do I avoid running out of money in retirement?
Running out of money in retirement — outliving assets — is the specific risk that makes retirement income planning different from accumulation planning. During accumulation, running out of time is the primary risk. In retirement, running out of money is. The most effective strategies for avoiding this outcome address it at the structural level rather than relying on investment performance to produce the required result. The first layer of protection is creating an income floor from guaranteed sources — Social Security, any pension income, and potentially a lifetime annuity from a portion of the IRA — that covers essential monthly expenses regardless of what the market does. When essential expenses are met by guaranteed income, the remaining invested portfolio does not face withdrawal pressure during market downturns, which allows the growth assets to recover rather than being sold at depressed prices to fund living expenses. The second layer is building a disciplined, written withdrawal plan for the invested portion — a target withdrawal rate, an adjustment policy for down markets, and a defined liquidity reserve that prevents opportunistic withdrawals that undermine the plan’s sustainability. The third layer is coordinating Social Security timing: delaying Social Security beyond age 62 increases the monthly benefit significantly and extends the longevity protection of the guaranteed income layer, often reducing the amount of IRA assets that must be converted to annuity income to cover the essential expense gap.
About the Author:
Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA and Chief Underwriter at Diversified Insurance Brokers (NPN 20471358), is a senior insurance and retirement professional with more than 25 years of real-world experience helping individuals, families, and business owners protect their income, assets, and long-term financial stability. As a long-time partner of the nationally licensed independent agency Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason provides trusted guidance across multiple specialties—including fixed and indexed annuities, long-term care planning, personal and business disability insurance, life insurance solutions, Group Health, and short-term health coverage. Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains active contracts with over 100 highly rated insurance carriers, ensuring clients have access to a broad and competitive marketplace.
His practical, education-first approach has earned recognition in publications such as VoyageATL, as well as his agency's featured coverage in Kiplinger— highlighting his commitment to financial clarity and client-focused planning. Drawing on deep product knowledge and years of hands-on field experience, Jason helps clients evaluate carriers, compare strategies, and build retirement and protection plans that are both secure and cost-efficient. Visitors who want to explore current annuity rates and compare options across multiple insurers can also use this annuity quote and comparison tool.
Explore More Lifetime Income Options: Browse our complete guide to What Should I Do With My Money After I Retire? — covering retirement income decisions for 401k, IRA, pension, TSP, 403b, Keogh & more from 100+ carriers.
Editorial Standards: Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure accuracy, clarity, and independence in all content. Learn more about our editorial standards and commitment to transparency.
