Best Independent Group Health Broker
Best Independent Group Health Broker
Jason Stolz CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
Best independent group health broker is not a title you earn by quoting one carrier faster than another. It is earned by helping employers make smarter decisions in a marketplace that changes constantly — without pushing a one-size-fits-all plan or forcing a renewal increase to feel inevitable. Group health insurance is often the single largest employee benefit expense for a business, and it can also be one of the most emotional decisions leadership teams face. When premiums rise year after year, employees get frustrated. When plans are confusing, employees disengage. When networks change unexpectedly, trust erodes. The right broker makes group health easier to manage, easier to explain, and more sustainable over time. Our resource on group health insurance provides the full landscape of employer health coverage, and our resource on why work with an independent group health insurance broker covers the structural advantages of independent placement in more detail.
At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we operate as an independent group health brokerage. That independence matters because it changes who we work for. Our loyalty is to your business and your workforce, not to a carrier’s production targets or a limited carrier shelf. We compare plans across multiple carriers and funding models, and we help employers choose a plan structure that fits their goals today while still giving them options at renewal. We don’t treat group health like a once-a-year transaction — we treat it like a long-term strategy that influences employee retention, company culture, and financial stability.
This page explains what an independent group health broker actually does, why independence matters, how the best brokers approach renewals, how funding models such as level funding and partial self-funding can change outcomes, and what to look for when choosing a broker you can stay with long term. If you are tired of surprise renewals, limited plan choices, or brokers who disappear after open enrollment, the goal here is to give you a clearer framework for choosing a broker that operates as an advocate — not a salesperson.
Compare Group Health Options With an Independent Broker
Tell us your goals and what’s frustrating about your current plan. We’ll show the carrier and funding options that may fit better.
Independent Broker vs. Captive/Single-Carrier Broker — What Employers Actually Get
The most important question an employer can ask when evaluating a benefits broker is not “how long have you been in business?” — it is “how many carriers can you actually market my plan to, and what happens when my current carrier stops being the best fit?” The table below summarizes the practical differences across the dimensions that matter most to employers evaluating brokerage relationships.
| Dimension | Independent Group Health Broker | Captive or Single-Carrier Broker |
|---|---|---|
| Carrier Access | Licensed with multiple carriers — can market the employer group to whichever carriers are most competitive for the specific employer profile, industry, size, and geography | Tied to one carrier or a narrow panel — renewal options are limited to what that carrier offers; if the current carrier is no longer competitive, the employer’s options are restricted |
| Funding Model Options | Can present fully insured, level-funded, and partially self-funded options side by side — employer chooses the model that fits their risk tolerance and financial goals | Often limited to one funding structure — level-funded and self-funded alternatives may never be discussed because the carrier relationship doesn’t support them |
| Plan Design Flexibility | Can match the employer’s workforce profile to the plan design that fits — HMO, PPO, HSA-qualified, tiered networks, consumer-directed designs — across multiple carrier product portfolios | Plan design options are limited to what the single carrier offers; workforce needs that fall outside the carrier’s product menu go unaddressed |
| Renewal Leverage | Can take renewal to the full market — if current carrier increases rates, the broker has real alternatives to present and genuine negotiating position based on competitive alternatives | Renewal is a single-carrier conversation — if that carrier increases rates, the broker’s only lever is persuasion, not competition; employer often feels the increase is inevitable |
| Conflict of Interest Risk | Loyalty is to the employer; compensation is earned by finding the best fit across the market, not by keeping an employer in a specific carrier relationship | Compensation and relationship incentives may favor keeping employers in one carrier’s products regardless of whether alternatives would produce better value |
| Strategy vs. Transaction | Treats group health as a multi-year strategy — reviews plan performance, adjusts structure as the employer grows, and plans renewals months in advance | Often transactional — focused on annual renewal within the existing carrier relationship rather than long-term employer benefit strategy |
| Multi-State Capability | Can address employers with workforce distribution across multiple states by evaluating network performance and carrier competitiveness by region | Geographic capability is limited to the single carrier’s network footprint — may not be competitive in all regions where the employer operates |
What Does an Independent Group Health Broker Do?
An independent group health broker acts as your advocate in the employer health insurance marketplace. The role is broader than finding a plan. A strong broker helps you evaluate the structure of your current benefits, explains why costs are moving, markets your plan to appropriate carriers, and helps you select a design that balances premium, out-of-pocket exposure, and employee experience. Independence matters because a broker who is not tied to one carrier can bring you more than one answer when your plan stops working. Our resource on why work with an independent group health insurance broker covers the structural advantage of multi-carrier access in practical terms.
In practice, an independent broker’s job includes gathering accurate census information, understanding your workforce demographics, confirming eligibility and participation requirements, helping you choose employer contribution strategy, comparing plan designs, and supporting enrollment logistics. It also includes ongoing service — answering employer questions, helping employees navigate benefits, and supporting plan changes or life events. Most importantly, it includes renewal planning that starts early rather than becoming a last-minute scramble. Our resource on how to set up group health insurance for employees covers the documentation and setup process that independent brokers manage alongside employers from the initial plan establishment.
At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we also help employers understand how different plan structures change long-term outcomes. Some employers want the simplicity of a fully insured group plan. Some employers want greater transparency and more control over how claims dollars are used. Some employers want alternative funding models that preserve comprehensive coverage while improving predictability. Because we are independent, we can bring those options to the table instead of forcing every employer into the same template. If you want a broader overview of employer coverage structures, start with group medical insurance, which provides a foundational view of how group options differ from individual coverage approaches.
Why Independence Matters in Group Health Insurance
Many businesses believe they are working with an independent broker when the broker is effectively tied to one or two carriers. Sometimes that relationship exists because the broker only has limited appointments. Other times it exists because the broker is influenced by internal agreements, volume incentives, or service models that make it inconvenient to shop more broadly. The employer experiences the result as limited choices, slow quoting, and renewal conversations that feel pre-determined.
Independence matters because group health is not static. Carrier appetite changes. Network competitiveness changes. Underwriting and rating models shift. A plan that was strong two years ago can become uncompetitive quickly. A captive or constrained broker may have no practical alternative other than asking the employer to accept increases or reduce benefits. An independent broker can market the plan more broadly and evaluate multiple strategies when the current carrier stops being the best fit. Our resource on ACA alternatives for company healthcare covers how funding model options expand when a broker can step outside the standard fully insured framework.
Independence also matters when a company wants to explore different funding approaches. Many employers never hear about level-funded or partially self-funded options because their broker does not present them or does not have a process for explaining them clearly. The best independent brokers present options in plain language and help employers decide whether the added strategy is worth it. Our resource on group health insurance cost for small business covers the cost structure baseline that most employer evaluations start from before funding model alternatives are introduced.
Group Health Planning Is More Than Picking a Policy
Employers often approach group health with one urgent question: “How do we lower premiums?” That question matters, but the best outcome usually comes from asking better questions. What benefits does the workforce actually value? Where is the plan creating friction? Are employees avoiding care because of out-of-pocket exposure? Are network limitations causing dissatisfaction? Is prescription coverage driving unexpected costs? Are deductibles too high for your workforce profile? Are renewal increases happening because of plan structure, claims trends, or market competition?
An independent group health broker helps employers answer these questions by starting with how the plan is being used. That may include reviewing plan design, identifying benefit pain points, and understanding employee distribution across states or regions. From there, the broker can compare alternative plan designs, alternative networks, and alternative funding structures that better fit the employer’s goals. Our resource on creditable coverage by employer size covers how employer size affects plan rules and eligibility requirements that factor into these planning decisions.
This is also where the employer’s contribution strategy matters. A plan that is technically affordable on paper can still feel unacceptable if employees believe it is confusing or hard to use. The best brokers help employers design a plan that employees understand and value, because employee engagement is a major factor in long-term satisfaction and retention. Employers evaluating very small group options can review best group health insurance options for 2-person businesses for context on how eligibility and plan design work at the micro-group level, and our resource on group health insurance for 500 employees covers the considerations that grow alongside larger workforces.
How Independent Brokers Evaluate Funding Models
Many employers assume group health means fully insured coverage. Fully insured plans can be a solid fit, especially for employers that want maximum simplicity and predictable monthly costs. However, the fully insured structure also bundles claims risk pricing, carrier margin, and administrative costs into one premium. Employers often feel like they have little control over that bundle, especially when renewals increase without a clear explanation.
This is why many independent brokers present modern funding models, such as level-funded and partially self-funded plans, as alternatives. These designs preserve the group health structure while changing how claims dollars are treated and how risk is managed. Employers often like these options because they can improve transparency and sometimes create opportunities to benefit when claims run favorably. If you want the foundational explanation of alternative funding structures, review what is self-funded group health insurance, which explains the mechanics clearly and helps employers understand why these models are often positioned as a path to more control.
Level-funded designs specifically use stop-loss insurance to cap claim exposure while allowing employers to participate in favorable utilization outcomes. Our resource on understanding stop-loss insurance in level-funded plans explains how the protection layer works and what attachment point decisions mean for employer risk tolerance. Our resource on level-funded health insurance tax benefits explained covers how funding structure affects employer tax treatment. And our resource on can small groups get health insurance refunds explains how surplus credits work in level-funded designs when claims run favorably. Many employers also want to understand the practical case for choosing level funding as a multi-year strategy — the page why choose group level funding provides that context directly.
Why Employee Experience and Retention Matter
Group health is not only a cost item. It is one of the strongest signals employees receive about how the company values them. When benefits are confusing, employees assume the company checked a box rather than offering a thoughtful plan. When networks are too narrow, employees feel trapped. When out-of-pocket exposure is too high, employees delay care and become frustrated. When renewal changes are not communicated clearly, employees blame the employer — even if the employer had limited options.
The best independent group health brokers focus on how employees actually experience their benefits. That means evaluating provider access, prescription design, common utilization patterns, and the employee’s understanding of the plan. It also means helping employers communicate benefits in plain language so employees know what they have and how to use it. Employee experience also connects directly to retention — when employees are comparing job offers, healthcare is often one of the top decision factors. A strong group health plan can reduce turnover, especially in competitive labor markets. The cost of replacing employees is often higher than modest benefit improvements.
Supporting Compliance and Employer Responsibility
Group health benefits come with real responsibilities. Eligibility definitions, participation thresholds, required notices, and enrollment documentation all matter. Employers that treat group health as “set it and forget it” can create compliance and administrative risk without realizing it. That is why broker support matters beyond quoting. An independent broker helps employers keep the plan running smoothly throughout the year, not just during open enrollment — including onboarding and terminations, qualifying life events, dependent changes, and plan questions that arise as employees use benefits.
For employers who are still determining when group coverage becomes feasible or what minimum thresholds apply, minimum employees for group health insurance can help clarify how eligibility is usually evaluated. Our resource on can 1099s get group level funding covers the common eligibility question around contractor workers and whether they count toward group participation requirements.
Renewal Strategy and Long-Term Cost Control
The most common employer frustration in group health is renewal shock. Employers get a rate increase late in the year, there is little time to respond, and the only options feel like “pay more” or “reduce benefits.” A strong independent broker approaches renewals differently — as a process that starts early, not a document that arrives in the mail. Strong brokers review plan performance and market competitiveness well before the renewal deadline. They help employers understand what is driving increases, whether claims trends are truly the issue, and whether the carrier is still competitive in the market.
If the current plan is no longer the best fit, an independent broker can market the group to alternative carriers and evaluate plan designs that could reduce volatility. The broker can also evaluate funding model changes if the employer wants more control. Employers often want clarity on common questions that come up during plan selection and renewal — the resource top questions employers ask about group health insurance can be helpful for setting expectations and understanding what the broker should be addressing proactively. For employers already in a plan and wanting to benchmark whether their current plan is still competitive, our resource on getting a second opinion on your group health insurance quote covers the renewal review process.
How to Identify the Best Independent Group Health Broker
If you are searching for the best independent group health broker, it helps to know what to look for beyond marketing claims. The best brokers explain plan differences in plain language. They show their work. They present multiple strategies rather than one quote. They discuss renewal planning early. They can support multi-state needs if your workforce is distributed. They know how participation and contribution rules affect eligibility. They can explain level funding and stop-loss without turning the conversation into a technical lecture. They have a process for employee communication so the plan is actually used effectively.
It also matters how the broker supports you after enrollment. Many employers have experienced the vanishing broker problem, where the broker is responsive during quoting but difficult to reach after the plan is issued. The best brokers provide ongoing service and treat the employer relationship as long term. Independence also means the broker is comfortable telling you the truth — sometimes a plan is not the right fit, sometimes a funding model is too aggressive, and sometimes the best move is to simplify. The best brokers are not trying to force a product; they are trying to build a sustainable benefit strategy.
Who Benefits Most From an Independent Group Health Broker?
Independent brokerage is valuable for employers of all sizes, but it becomes especially valuable when the employer feels stuck. Stuck can mean rising premiums, limited carrier options, poor service, confusing plan designs, or a workforce that is changing faster than the current plan can accommodate. Growing companies often benefit because their eligibility and plan options expand as headcount increases, and they need a broker who can adjust strategy as the business evolves. Our resources on best group health insurance options for 2-person businesses and group health insurance for 500 employees cover how plan design considerations shift across the size spectrum.
Multi-state employers benefit because network considerations and plan administration become more complex. Employers with diverse workforce demographics benefit because one plan design rarely fits everyone equally well. Employers who want transparency benefit because independent brokers can explain the pricing, the funding model, and the tradeoffs in a way that supports better decisions. Independent brokerage is also valuable for micro-groups that need eligibility confirmation and documentation support — some of the strongest value a broker can provide to small teams is preventing wasted time by confirming what the carrier will require before quoting begins. Our resource on minimum employees for group health insurance covers the eligibility threshold questions that affect small group applications specifically.
Why Businesses Choose Diversified Insurance Brokers
Diversified Insurance Brokers is a family-owned insurance agency founded in 1980. We serve businesses nationwide and focus on building group health strategies that balance cost control, employee satisfaction, and long-term sustainability. Our independence allows us to compare across carriers and funding models, and our consultative approach helps employers understand their options without being pressured into a one-carrier answer. Employers choose us because we explain complex issues in plain language and help them build plans they can actually keep. We also focus heavily on renewal strategy, because the real value of group health is not getting issued — it is renewing with confidence.
If you are looking for a broker who treats group health as a strategic business decision, the next step is a structured comparison. We’ll start with your goals, confirm eligibility and participation realities, then show you what the market can actually offer.
Improve Your Renewal Strategy
If your renewal increases feel inevitable, we’ll show the market options and funding designs that can change the conversation.
What to Expect When Working With an Independent Broker
A strong broker relationship begins with discovery. The employer’s goals matter. A plan built for the lowest possible premium may not support retention. A plan built for the richest benefits may not be financially sustainable. The best approach is usually a balance: a structure the company can afford, employees can understand, and leadership can renew without constant disruption.
From there, a good broker markets the plan strategically — selecting carriers and funding models that are realistic given the employer’s size and geography, and presenting options in a way that supports decision-making rather than overwhelm. Once the plan is selected, the broker helps implementation go smoothly: employee communication, enrollment logistics, clean documentation. And after the plan is active, ongoing service matters. The best broker is available when employees have questions and when leadership needs to make changes throughout the year. Finally, the best brokers manage renewals proactively — planning months in advance, reviewing market competitiveness, and ensuring the employer never feels trapped by timing.
Talk With an Advisor Today
Choose how you’d like to connect—call or message us, then book a time that works for you.
Schedule here:
calendly.com/jason-dibcompanies/diversified-quotes
Licensed in all 50 states • Fiduciary, family-owned since 1980
FAQs: Best Independent Group Health Broker
What is an independent group health broker?
An independent group health broker is a licensed insurance professional who represents multiple insurance carriers and works on behalf of the employer rather than on behalf of any single insurer. The key practical implication of independence is that the broker’s recommendations can reflect a genuine comparison of options across the carrier market rather than being constrained by a limited carrier appointment list or financial incentive to favor a specific carrier. An independent broker can market an employer’s group to multiple carriers simultaneously, compare responses across different dimensions, and recommend a change when the current carrier is no longer competitive — without the conflict of interest that exists when the broker’s compensation depends on keeping the group with a specific carrier.
In practice, the degree of independence varies meaningfully across brokers who describe themselves as independent. True independence requires broad carrier access, no volume-based override agreements that create pressure to favor specific carriers, expertise across multiple funding models (fully insured, level-funded, self-funded), and a service model that prioritizes the employer’s long-term cost and benefit outcomes over the broker’s administrative convenience. Evaluating these dimensions specifically — not just accepting “independent broker” as a marketing claim — is important when choosing a group health broker relationship.
Is there a cost to use a group health broker?
In most group health insurance arrangements, broker compensation is embedded in the plan premium rather than charged as a separate fee to the employer. The insurance carrier pays the broker a commission — typically expressed as a percentage of premium or a per-employee per-month amount — that is factored into the carrier’s premium pricing. From the employer’s perspective, this means the broker’s services are effectively included in the cost of the insurance, and choosing not to use a broker does not typically reduce the premium — the carrier simply retains the commission amount rather than paying it out.
Some brokers, particularly those working with larger employers or offering more intensive consulting services, charge direct advisory fees in addition to or instead of carrier commissions. Fee-based arrangements can actually align incentives more cleanly — a broker paid a flat fee has no financial incentive to favor higher-premium carriers. For most small-to-mid-size employer groups, the commission-based model is the norm, and the broker’s value is demonstrated through the quality of the advisory work rather than through fee transparency. The most important practical point is that working with a good independent broker is not meaningfully more expensive than working with no broker or working with a constrained broker — and the value produced by better plan selection, better renewal management, and better ongoing service significantly exceeds any marginal cost difference.
Can a broker help reduce group health insurance costs?
Yes — and cost reduction is one of the most tangible demonstrations of broker value when it is delivered through genuine market comparison, funding model evaluation, and plan design analysis rather than simply by choosing lower benefits. An independent broker can reduce costs through several mechanisms. Carrier competition at renewal — submitting the group to multiple carriers simultaneously and using competitive offers to negotiate better terms — can produce meaningful premium improvements compared to accepting the renewing carrier’s initial rate without challenge. Funding model transitions — moving from a fully insured plan to a level-funded or self-funded structure when the employer’s profile supports it — can remove carrier margin and risk loading from the cost structure and produce savings that compound over multiple years. Plan design modifications — adjusting deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, copay structures, or network tier designs — can reallocate cost-sharing in ways that reduce premium without eliminating the benefits employees value most. Pharmacy benefit optimization — reviewing the plan’s pharmacy benefit design, formulary structure, and PBM arrangement — can identify savings opportunities in one of the fastest-growing cost categories in group health insurance.
The important caveat is that cost reduction at the expense of plan quality — eliminating meaningful benefits, narrowing networks too aggressively, or reducing employer contributions below sustainable participation levels — often produces short-term cost savings and long-term recruitment, retention, and compliance problems. The best brokers pursue cost efficiency rather than cost minimization, preserving the plan’s value while removing unnecessary expenses.
Do brokers assist after enrollment?
Ongoing service after enrollment is a core component of what distinguishes high-value broker relationships from transactional ones — and it is the dimension where broker quality differences are most clearly experienced by employers. Post-enrollment service from a strong independent broker includes prompt responses to employer questions about eligibility, qualifying life events, plan changes, and compliance obligations throughout the year. It includes helping employees who encounter billing problems or claims issues navigate the carrier’s resolution process rather than leaving employees to manage these situations independently. It includes tracking plan performance and identifying concerning trends before the renewal notice arrives. And it includes proactive communication about regulatory changes, ACA reporting deadlines, COBRA requirements, and other compliance events that affect the employer’s group health plan administration.
Many employers have experienced the “vanishing broker” problem — a broker who was attentive during quoting and enrollment but becomes difficult to reach after the plan is issued. This pattern is a clear signal of a transactional rather than advisory broker relationship. When evaluating a broker relationship, asking specifically how post-enrollment service is structured — who handles day-to-day questions, what the response time expectation is, and how the broker monitors plan performance throughout the year — provides important information about whether the relationship will deliver ongoing value or become a once-a-year renewal conversation.
Can small businesses use a group health broker?
Absolutely — and small businesses often benefit the most from independent broker guidance precisely because smaller groups have fewer internal resources dedicated to benefits management and are most dependent on the broker for both strategic advice and administrative support. Small employers navigating group health for the first time face questions about minimum participation requirements, carrier eligibility thresholds, contribution strategy, and plan selection that can be genuinely confusing without knowledgeable guidance. Small employers who are experiencing rising renewal rates have fewer options for internal cost management and benefit most from a broker who can identify competitive alternatives in the market.
For employers below the typical fully insured market’s minimum group size, level-funded plans and association-based group options may provide access to group health coverage that would not otherwise be available. For employers approaching minimum group thresholds, understanding the eligibility and participation rules before investing in the quoting process prevents wasted time. Our resource on minimum employees for group health insurance clarifies how carriers typically evaluate group eligibility and what thresholds apply at different group sizes.
How does level funding differ from traditional group health insurance?
In traditional fully insured group health insurance, the employer pays a fixed monthly premium to an insurance carrier that assumes all claims risk and retains all savings when claims run favorably. The employer has limited visibility into actual claims cost and limited ability to benefit from good health outcomes in the group. In a level-funded plan, the employer pays a similar-looking fixed monthly amount — but that amount funds three separate components: an expected claims reserve, stop-loss insurance to protect against adverse claims, and TPA administrative fees. When actual claims are below the funded level, the employer typically receives a year-end surplus return rather than surrendering those dollars to the carrier.
The financial advantage of level-funded plans is most visible over multi-year periods in groups with favorable claims experience — the employer accumulates surplus returns, gains visibility into actual claims drivers, and can use that information to implement targeted wellness or cost management programs. The additional complexity compared to fully insured — understanding stop-loss structure, working with a TPA, managing the claims funding process — is manageable for most employers with broker support and typically produces better long-term financial outcomes than passive fully insured premium payment. Our resource on why group level funding explains the full mechanics and the employer profiles for which this structure produces the most compelling value.
How do I know if my current broker is serving me well?
Several specific questions reveal the quality of a group health broker relationship. Does the broker present multiple carrier options at renewal — including options the group is not currently with — and provide a clear explanation of the recommendation? Or does the renewal conversation consistently conclude with “your current carrier is the best option” without demonstrable market comparison? Does the broker present level-funded or self-funded alternatives when they might benefit the employer’s situation? Does the broker start the renewal process at least three to four months before the renewal date, or do proposals consistently arrive as last-minute scrambles? Does the broker respond promptly to questions during the year, or does responsiveness drop after open enrollment concludes?
If the honest answer to several of these questions suggests limited advisor value, a second opinion is appropriate and costs nothing. Our group health insurance second opinion service provides an independent evaluation of your current plan and renewal against the full market of alternatives — identifying whether better options exist and whether the strategic approach being recommended reflects genuine analysis or a constrained view of the available marketplace.
What should I expect from the first conversation with a new broker?
A productive first conversation with an independent group health broker should feel like a discovery process focused on understanding your business, your workforce, and your priorities — not like a sales pitch for a specific product or carrier. The broker should ask about your current plan structure, your current premium cost and contribution strategy, what aspects of the current plan are working well and what is creating friction, how many employees and dependents are enrolled, which states your workforce is located in, and what your primary goals are for the benefits program (cost control, employee retention, plan simplicity, or some combination). The broker should also ask about your timeline — when your current plan renews, how much time you have for an evaluation, and whether there are any organizational changes (headcount growth, geographic expansion, new ownership structure) that affect the benefits planning context.
What you should not experience is a broker who jumps immediately to quoting a specific carrier or funding model before understanding your situation. A broker who leads with a solution rather than a discovery process is demonstrating either limited process sophistication or a pre-determined recommendation that does not reflect genuine analysis of your specific situation. The right first conversation sets up a structured evaluation that generates real options — not a fast path to a product the broker was going to recommend regardless of what you told them.
Browse Group Health Insurance by Industry
About the Author:
Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA and Chief Underwriter at Diversified Insurance Brokers (NPN 20471358), is a senior insurance and retirement professional with more than 25 years of real-world experience helping individuals, families, and business owners protect their income, assets, and long-term financial stability. As a long-time partner of the nationally licensed independent agency Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason provides trusted guidance across multiple specialties—including fixed and indexed annuities, long-term care planning, personal and business disability insurance, life insurance solutions, Group Health, Travel Medical and Evacuation Insurance, and short-term health coverage. Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains active contracts with over 100 highly rated insurance carriers, ensuring clients have access to a broad and competitive marketplace.
His practical, education-first approach has earned recognition in publications such as VoyageATL, and contributions from his agency featured in Kiplinger and GoBankingRates— highlighting his commitment to financial clarity and client-focused planning. Drawing on deep product knowledge and years of hands-on field experience, Jason helps clients evaluate carriers, compare strategies, and build retirement and protection plans that are both secure and cost-efficient. Visitors who want to explore current annuity rates and compare options across multiple insurers can also use this annuity quote and comparison tool.
Explore All Group Health Insurance Options: Browse our complete Group Health Insurance guide — covering small business, company size options, industry-specific plans, level funding & ACA alternatives.
Last Reviewed: June 4, 2026 |
Reviewed by: Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
Chief Underwriter, Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. | NPN: 20471358 | Licensed in all 50 states
Editorial Standards: Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure accuracy, clarity, and independence in all content. Learn more about our editorial standards and commitment to transparency.
