Fixed Annuity Ladder Strategy
Fixed Annuity Ladder Strategy
Jason Stolz CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
The Fixed Annuity Ladder Strategy — What It Is and the Two Problems It Solves
A fixed annuity ladder solves two retirement planning problems simultaneously: rate timing risk and liquidity stress. Rate timing risk is the problem of locking your entire principal into one guarantee period at one interest rate level — if rates rise after you commit, all your capital is locked out of the improvement for the remaining term. Liquidity stress is the problem of needing access to funds during a surrender period and facing charges that erode or eliminate the interest earned. The ladder strategy addresses both by dividing a total premium allocation into multiple fixed annuity contracts with staggered maturity dates rather than committing the full amount to a single term. Each contract in the ladder matures at a different date — creating periodic decision windows at which the owner can reinvest at then-current rates, take funds without surrender charges, reposition into a different product type, or direct the balance toward income. At Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA builds fixed annuity ladders customized to each client’s specific timeline, liquidity needs, and income objectives — comparing rates across more than 100 carriers to identify the best combination of rate, term, carrier financial strength, and renewal terms for each rung of the ladder. The strategy is not about predicting where interest rates will go — it is about building a structure that produces good outcomes across multiple rate environments without requiring any single rate prediction to be correct. Current fixed annuity rates and how they are set by insurance carriers establishes the rate environment context within which any ladder is constructed — the rate comparison across carriers at each term length is the analytical starting point for any specific ladder design.
Why a Ladder Beats One Large Fixed Annuity Purchase in Most Retirement Planning Scenarios
The appeal of a single large fixed annuity purchase is simplicity — one decision, one carrier, one rate, one surrender schedule. The limitation of that approach is concentration: all the rate timing, all the renewal risk, all the liquidity exposure, and all the carrier concentration is in a single contract. If the rate environment improves significantly after purchase, the owner has no capital available to capture the improvement until the entire contract matures. If an unexpected expense arises during the surrender period, the cost of accessing funds may be substantial. If the carrier’s renewal rate at the original contract’s maturity is unfavorable, the entire balance is subject to that single renewal moment with no diversification across maturity dates. The ladder eliminates the concentration problem without eliminating the principal protection or guaranteed rate advantages that make fixed annuities attractive in the first place — and it does so at a modest cost in blended yield, since the shorter-term rungs typically earn lower rates than the longest-term rung would. Whether that blended yield reduction is worth the liquidity, timing diversification, and renewal flexibility the ladder provides is a planning judgment that depends on the specific amount, the timeline, and how important each of the ladder’s benefits is to the individual buyer’s retirement plan. What a fixed annuity is and how its guarantee period, surrender schedule, and renewal mechanics work establishes the product-level foundation for understanding why staggering maturities produces different planning outcomes than a single large contract. Surrender charges and their interaction with the ladder’s maturity windows is the cost dimension that quantifies what the ladder’s liquidity provisions are worth — the value of a maturity window is that it eliminates the surrender charge that would otherwise apply to early access.
Ensure you are receiving the absolute top rates
Current Fixed Annuity Rates
Compare today’s best fixed annuity rates from top carriers.
Current Bonus Annuity Rates
See which annuities offer the highest upfront bonus today.
Request an Annuity Quote
Submit our annuity request form to get personalized rate options.
Lifetime Income Calculator
Use our calculator to see how much guaranteed income your annuity can provide.
Common Ladder Designs — Three Rungs, Five Rungs, and the Rolling Ladder
| Ladder Design | Structure | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|
| Three-rung ladder (3/5/7) | Total premium divided approximately equally across a 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year MYGA; maturities occur at years 3, 5, and 7 from purchase; each maturing contract provides a decision window for that third of the premium without disrupting the other two contracts still accumulating | Retirees who want near-term liquidity access at year 3 alongside meaningful long-term rate lock; simple structure with three distinct decision moments over 7 years; good balance between yield optimization at the long end and flexibility at the short end; the most commonly constructed MYGA ladder design in the current rate environment |
| Five-rung ladder (3/4/5/6/7 or annual) | Total premium divided into five equal portions across five sequential or near-sequential terms; maturities occur roughly every one to two years across a 5–7 year span; creates a near-annual cadence of maturity events during which each tranche can be reinvested, repositioned, or distributed | Retirees who anticipate variable annual income needs or who want maximum reinvestment flexibility — the annual or near-annual maturity cadence means the owner always has a decision window approaching within 1–2 years; trades some yield efficiency for maximum flexibility; appropriate when the owner’s income needs or rate environment view is expected to evolve meaningfully over the next 5–7 years |
| Rolling ladder | A ladder that is perpetually maintained by reinvesting each maturing contract into a new term — the first rung matures and is rolled into a new 7-year contract at then-current rates, the second rung matures and is rolled into a new 7-year contract, and so forth; over time the ladder continues producing maturity windows without ever deploying the full balance into a single long-term commitment | Long-horizon conservative accumulators who want to maintain principal protection and tax-deferred growth indefinitely without ever committing the entire balance to a single rate environment; the rolling structure captures improving rates as they occur (by rolling maturities into new longer-term contracts) while maintaining the periodic decision windows that provide ongoing flexibility and liquidity access |
| Income-staggered ladder | Uses deferred income annuities or FIAs with income riders rather than pure accumulation MYGAs; income activation is staggered across different ages — income stream one starts at 65, income stream two at 70, income stream three at 75 — creating an increasing income flow that grows with age | Pre-retirees who want to pre-position guaranteed income at multiple future ages rather than all at once; later income streams provide higher payout percentages because the owner is older at activation; the staggered structure creates planned “retirement raises” as each new income stream activates; addresses longevity risk by ensuring income grows in later decades when healthcare and care costs tend to be highest |
The four design frameworks in the table represent the most common approaches to fixed annuity laddering — and the right design for any specific client depends on the answers to three questions: when might funds be needed, how important is yield maximization versus flexibility, and whether the ladder’s purpose is accumulation alone or income generation as well. The free withdrawal rules for each contract in the ladder — the annual penalty-free access available during the surrender period — determine how much liquidity is available between maturity events without waiting for a full contract to mature. Understanding the free withdrawal provision at each rung is part of the complete liquidity analysis for any ladder design. How annuities are taxed in retirement — and specifically how the LIFO rule applies to non-qualified MYGA withdrawals — is the tax dimension that affects how the ladder’s maturity windows interact with taxable income planning. When a non-qualified MYGA matures and the owner takes a distribution, the earnings credited during the contract period are taxable as ordinary income in the year of distribution; staggering the maturity dates across different years allows some control over which tax years the income is recognized rather than concentrating all taxable gain in a single year.
How to Build a Fixed Annuity Ladder — The Practical Construction Process
Building a fixed annuity ladder that serves a specific retirement plan requires working through four sequential questions before selecting any specific product or carrier. The first question is total allocation: how much of the overall savings should be in the ladder versus other assets? Fixed annuities serve the conservative, principal-protected accumulation role in a retirement portfolio — the “safe bucket” that holds funds whose loss would be materially harmful to the retirement plan. The ladder allocation typically represents funds the owner is confident will not be needed for daily living expenses during the accumulation period but which may be needed at various points for large expenses or income supplementation. The second question is the number of rungs and the term spacing: how many contracts, over what span of years, and spaced how far apart? This determines the maturity cadence — the frequency with which decision windows occur — and is primarily driven by the owner’s liquidity timeline and expected income needs.
The third question is allocation per rung: equal splits or weighted differently toward specific terms? Equal splits provide symmetric maturity windows and a straightforward blended rate. Weighted allocations — placing more capital in longer-term rungs for the rate premium, or in shorter-term rungs for near-term access — customize the yield-versus-liquidity tradeoff based on the owner’s specific priorities. The fourth question is carrier selection at each rung: which carrier provides the best combination of rate, financial strength, free withdrawal terms, and renewal options for each specific term? Comparing rates across multiple carriers at each term length — rather than using a single carrier for all rungs — captures the full market opportunity and allows the owner to identify which carrier is pricing most aggressively for each specific term at the time of purchase. Spreading the ladder across multiple carriers also diversifies the carrier concentration risk — the state guarantee association protection limits apply per carrier rather than per contract, so a single carrier carrying the entire ladder allocation concentrates the potential insolvency exposure in a way that distributing across carriers avoids. Products like the American National Palladium MYG annuity with its flexible term options and the American Life Fusion MYGIA with its market-linked bonus potential illustrate the range of fixed annuity designs available for different rungs of a ladder. Corebridge Financial’s carrier profile and the Corebridge American Pathway Fixed Annuities represent a well-established institutional carrier option for ladder construction. The Heartland National Secure Rate annuity with its low entry point and flexible access provisions is suited for rungs where lower minimum premiums or enhanced liquidity provisions are priorities. The Lincoln MyGuarantee Plus provides predictable growth across multiple term lengths from one of the market’s most established carriers; Jackson National’s carrier profile provides context for evaluating a comparable institutional option. The Nationwide Secure Growth fixed annuity delivers reliable growth and principal protection within Nationwide’s nationally recognized institutional carrier framework. The North American Guarantee Plus MYGA specifically highlights its renewal options alongside the fixed rate guarantee — a design consideration relevant for ladder rungs where the renewal terms at maturity are as important as the initial rate. The North American Guaranteed Allocation 10 provides fixed growth with flexible strategy allocation across a longer term — suitable for the longest rung of a ladder designed around a 7–10 year horizon. Reliance Standard’s carrier financial profile establishes the backing behind the Reliance Standard Guarantee 5 annuity — a 5-year guarantee period product with built-in liquidity provisions designed for mid-ladder positioning. The Symetra Select Max and the Symetra Select Pro — both fixed deferred annuity designs emphasizing flexibility and strong guarantees — provide options for different ladder positions depending on the term length and liquidity structure that fits each rung’s specific role. The Americo Platinum Assure MYGA rounds out the MYGA product landscape with predictable growth, defined liquidity provisions, and long-term protection suited for a conservative ladder rung where simplicity and financial strength are the primary selection criteria. Mutual of Omaha’s carrier profile and Ohio National’s financial strength provide additional carrier quality reference points for evaluating the institutional backing available in the fixed annuity market at each potential ladder rung.
The Rolling Ladder and the 1035 Exchange — How the Strategy Perpetuates Itself
The rolling ladder is the most powerful expression of the laddering strategy because it turns a time-limited design into a perpetual structure — each maturing contract is reinvested into a new contract at the long end of the ladder, restoring the full term spectrum and maintaining the periodic maturity windows indefinitely. A three-rung 3/5/7 ladder that is rolled forward becomes a self-sustaining structure: when the 3-year contract matures, the owner evaluates the rate environment and rolls it into a new 7-year contract, maintaining three simultaneous contracts with staggered maturities. The new 7-year rung locks in the current rate for the maximum available term, while the existing 5-year and 7-year contracts (now 3 and 5 years remaining) continue toward their next maturity windows. Every three years, a maturity occurs; every maturity is an opportunity to assess the rate environment and the owner’s evolving needs; every reinvestment at the long end of the ladder captures the highest available rate for the next long-term window. Over time, the rolling ladder’s blended rate adjusts to changing rate environments automatically — rising rate periods increase the blended rate as maturities roll into higher-rate new contracts; falling rate periods affect only the maturing rung, not the longer positions that remain locked at prior higher rates. How 1035 exchanges work for existing fixed annuity positions that have accumulated deferred earnings — the tax-free transfer mechanism that allows rolling a maturing contract’s full accumulated value including deferred earnings into a new contract without triggering ordinary income tax — is the tax planning tool that preserves the ladder’s full compounding advantage across reinvestment events. Rather than surrendering the maturing contract and recognizing the deferred earnings as taxable income before reinvesting the after-tax amount in a new contract, the 1035 exchange moves the full pre-tax accumulated value directly into the new contract, maintaining the tax-deferred compounding base intact. How tax deferral creates compounding advantage over multi-year and multi-decade horizons is the mathematical foundation for understanding why the 1035 exchange’s preservation of the pre-tax base is worth the administrative step it requires rather than taking a distribution and reinvesting the after-tax proceeds. The annuity rescue plan process reviews existing fixed annuity and MYGA positions to identify whether current contracts are positioned optimally within a ladder structure or whether repositioning would improve the blend of rates, terms, and carrier quality — confirming that the existing ladder continues to serve its intended purpose as the rate environment and the owner’s planning objectives evolve.
Ladder Design Variations — Matching Structure to Planning Objective
Not every fixed annuity ladder is a pure MYGA accumulation structure — the laddering concept adapts to different planning objectives by varying the product type used at each rung while maintaining the core staggered-maturity framework. The income-staggered ladder places the accumulated value of each rung into a deferred income annuity or a fixed indexed annuity with an income rider at maturity, with each rung’s income activation targeted at a different age. Rather than a single large income commitment made at retirement, the income-staggered ladder builds income in layers as each rung matures: a rung purchased at 60 with a 5-year deferral activates income at 65; a rung purchased with a 10-year deferral activates income at 70; a rung with a 15-year deferral activates at 75. Each new income stream activates at a higher age with a higher payout percentage, creating a series of planned income increases across the retirement period — the “retirement raise” structure that addresses the increasing income needs of later decades when healthcare and care costs tend to rise. Annuity strategies for early retirees specifically address the income-staggered ladder for clients who retire before traditional retirement age — where a long accumulation period before income activation allows the ladder’s benefit bases to grow substantially before any income stream activates. The best annuity for lifetime income from a specific accumulated base is identified through the multi-carrier income illustration process that compares payout rates, benefit base designs, and income rider structures — the same comparison that informs rung selection for an income-staggered ladder. Guaranteed income from annuities across all structures establishes the distribution-phase framework within which the income-staggered ladder creates its increasing income architecture. How Social Security and annuities work together is the income planning coordination that surrounds the ladder — the ladder’s accumulation and eventual income serve alongside Social Security’s guaranteed baseline income to create the floor that covers essential household expenses in retirement. Annuity income as a monthly retirement income source translates each ladder rung’s eventual income amount into the monthly cash flow terms that connect to the actual household budget the income is designed to support. Annuities for conservative investors as a planning framework situates the fixed annuity ladder within the conservative end of the retirement accumulation spectrum — the planning approach for households who prioritize capital preservation, predictable growth, and guaranteed outcomes over market participation and maximum return potential. What annuity guarantees mean at the carrier financial strength level — and specifically how state guarantee associations provide backstop protection for guaranteed rate contracts if a carrier becomes insolvent — is the security framework that applies to every rung of any ladder and that informs the carrier selection process at each term. Whether an annuity can lose money in the MYGA ladder context clarifies the specific risks — early surrender charges and carrier insolvency — versus the risks that the principal protection floor eliminates, providing the complete risk characterization that any ladder buyer should understand before construction.
Design Your Fixed Annuity Ladder
We compare guaranteed rates, term options, free withdrawal provisions, carrier financial strength, and renewal terms across 100+ carriers — building a custom ladder design around your specific timeline, liquidity needs, and income objectives.
Talk With an Advisor Today
Choose how you’d like to connect—call or message us, then book a time that works for you.
Schedule here:
calendly.com/jason-dibcompanies/diversified-quotes
Licensed in all 50 states • Fiduciary, family-owned since 1980
FAQs: Fixed Annuity Ladder Strategy
How many rungs should my fixed annuity ladder have?
The right number of rungs depends on two things: the total premium amount being allocated and how frequently you want access to a maturity window. Most fixed annuity ladders have three to five rungs — enough to create meaningful staggering without fragmenting the premium into amounts too small to qualify for competitive rate tiers at each carrier. A three-rung ladder is the most common starting design because it is simple to construct, produces three maturity events over a 5–7 year period, and divides the premium into three equal portions that most carriers accept at competitive rates. A five-rung ladder creates a more frequent maturity cadence — roughly annual or every-other-year decision windows — which is appropriate for buyers who anticipate needing access more frequently or who want maximum reinvestment flexibility.
Minimum premium thresholds at each carrier are a practical constraint on the number of rungs. If the total available premium is $150,000, a five-rung ladder puts $30,000 in each contract — which is above most carriers’ minimums but below the premium banding thresholds at which some carriers offer enhanced rates. A three-rung ladder with $50,000 per rung may access better rates at some carriers because the $50,000 per-contract amount triggers more competitive rate tiers. The design should account for the specific minimum and banding thresholds at the carriers being used for each rung rather than imposing a default rung count that may not optimize rates for the actual premium amounts involved.
Should I use one carrier for all rungs or spread across multiple carriers?
Spreading the ladder across multiple carriers is generally preferable for two reasons. The first is rate optimization: different carriers price different terms most competitively at any given time — the carrier offering the best 3-year rate may not offer the best 5-year or 7-year rate, and using the best-available carrier for each specific term captures more yield across the full ladder than using a single carrier for all rungs. The carrier that is most aggressively pricing today may not be the market leader for every term length, so a multi-carrier comparison at each rung level is the accurate approach to maximizing the blended ladder rate.
The second reason is carrier concentration and state guarantee association coverage. State guarantee associations provide insolvency protection up to defined limits — typically $100,000–$500,000 depending on the state — per covered life per carrier. Concentrating the entire ladder allocation in a single carrier means the full premium is exposed to a single carrier’s financial health, and if that premium exceeds the state guarantee association’s coverage limit for that carrier, the excess is not protected. Spreading the ladder across multiple financially strong carriers diversifies the carrier concentration risk and may allow each rung to fall within the guarantee association coverage limits for its respective carrier. This is a relatively low-probability consideration given that fixed annuity carriers are required to maintain substantial reserves, but for larger premium amounts it is a planning dimension worth addressing at the design stage rather than discovering retrospectively.
What do I do when the first rung of my ladder matures?
When the first rung matures, the owner enters the maturity window — typically a 30-day period during which the full accumulated value is available without surrender charges. During this window, there are four primary options. The first is reinvestment into a new fixed annuity at then-current rates — if rates are favorable, rolling the matured rung into a new longer-term contract (typically at the long end of the ladder to maintain the full term spectrum) captures the current rate for the maximum available period. The second is reinvestment into a different product type — a fixed indexed annuity, a deferred income annuity, or another instrument that better serves the owner’s current planning objectives at this stage of retirement. The third is taking a distribution — withdrawing some or all of the matured balance for income, large expenses, or other current needs. The fourth is allowing automatic renewal at the carrier’s current rate for the new term, which requires no action but should be an intentional decision rather than a default outcome.
The maturity window evaluation should include: comparing the carrier’s current renewal rate against the broader market to confirm the renewal terms are competitive; assessing whether the owner’s planning objectives have evolved since the original contract was purchased; and confirming whether a 1035 exchange into a new contract at a different carrier would produce a better outcome than renewing with the original carrier. The worst decision is inattention — allowing the maturity window to close without evaluating the options and defaulting to automatic renewal at whatever rate the carrier sets, which may or may not be competitive with the current market. Monitoring the maturity date and beginning the evaluation process several weeks before the window opens allows enough time to make an informed decision rather than a reactive one.
Does the fixed annuity ladder work inside an IRA?
Yes — fixed annuity ladders can be constructed using IRA funds, with each rung funded through a direct rollover or trustee-to-trustee transfer from the IRA. The resulting contracts are qualified annuities where all distributions are taxed as ordinary income, and required minimum distribution rules apply at the same ages as the standard IRA. The tax-deferred growth benefit that makes MYGA ladders attractive for non-qualified funds is already provided by the IRA’s qualified account status, so the annuity adds its principal protection and guaranteed rate features rather than additional tax deferral. The ladder design within an IRA must account for the required minimum distribution timeline — the maturity dates for each rung should be selected to ensure that the annual free withdrawal provision or rung maturities align with the owner’s RMD obligations so that meeting RMD requirements does not trigger surrender charges that would otherwise apply.
For IRA funds specifically, the 1035 exchange rule applies when moving from one annuity to another within the IRA — the transfer preserves the qualified account status without triggering a taxable distribution. Between rungs at different carriers, the direct transfer mechanics must follow IRS rules for IRA-to-IRA transfers to maintain the tax-qualified status of the funds. The practical planning consideration is that an IRA-funded MYGA ladder is somewhat less flexible than a non-qualified ladder in terms of access timing, because IRA withdrawals before age 59½ face the 10% early withdrawal penalty in addition to ordinary income tax, and RMD requirements after the applicable age create mandatory distribution amounts that must be planned for within the ladder’s free withdrawal and maturity structure.
Is the fixed annuity ladder better than a bond ladder for conservative retirement savings?
The comparison depends on what the buyer prioritizes — and the two instruments have genuinely different strengths. A bond ladder — purchasing individual bonds with staggered maturities — provides FDIC-adjacent safety for U.S. Treasury bonds, full liquidity on the secondary market before maturity (though at market prices that may be above or below par), and interest payments distributed at regular intervals throughout the holding period. The fixed annuity MYGA ladder provides state guarantee association protection rather than FDIC insurance, no secondary market liquidity before maturity windows, and tax-deferred interest accumulation rather than current-period taxable interest payments.
The MYGA ladder’s advantages over a bond ladder are typically: higher available rates at equivalent credit quality levels (top MYGA rates from A-rated carriers currently exceed comparable Treasury and investment-grade corporate bond yields by a meaningful margin); tax-deferred compounding that prevents annual taxation of credited interest (compared to bond interest which is taxable annually for most bond types); and the elimination of market price risk — a MYGA held to maturity always returns the full principal plus credited interest regardless of what happens to interest rates during the term, while a bond held to maturity does the same but can trade below par during the holding period if rates rise. The bond ladder’s advantages are superior secondary market liquidity, FDIC or Treasury backing, and current-period interest income for buyers who need or prefer regular interest distributions rather than deferred accumulation. For retirees prioritizing after-tax accumulated value, simplicity, and principal protection without market price fluctuation, the MYGA ladder has historically compared favorably to bond ladders on a net-after-tax return basis at equivalent term lengths.
Can I build an income-generating ladder from MYGAs instead of just an accumulation ladder?
Yes — and this is one of the most effective applications of the laddering concept for pre-retirees who want to build income in layers rather than committing to a single large income purchase at retirement. The income ladder works by directing each maturing MYGA rung into an income-generating vehicle rather than reinvesting into another MYGA. Each rung matures at a different age, and at each maturity the accumulated value is directed into either a deferred income annuity or a fixed indexed annuity with an income rider — with each new income activation targeted at a progressively older age that receives a higher payout percentage.
The practical design: a pre-retiree at age 55 purchases three MYGA rungs. The first rung matures at age 60 and is directed into a deferred income annuity set to begin payments at age 65. The second rung matures at age 62 and is directed into an FIA income rider targeting activation at age 70. The third rung matures at age 64 and is directed into an FIA income rider targeting activation at age 75. At age 65, the first income stream begins. At age 70, the second activates — providing more income than the first because the buyer is older and the payout percentage is higher. At age 75, the third activates — providing even more income for the same reason. The result is a rising income structure that increases automatically as the buyer ages, addressing both the longevity risk of outliving a fixed income level and the healthcare cost escalation that typically characterizes later retirement decades. The design requires coordination of MYGA term lengths, income product selection at each maturity, and income activation timing — a process Diversified Insurance Brokers manages through the full annuity planning engagement.
About the Author:
Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA and Chief Underwriter at Diversified Insurance Brokers (NPN 20471358), is a senior insurance and retirement professional with more than 25 years of real-world experience helping individuals, families, and business owners protect their income, assets, and long-term financial stability. As a long-time partner of the nationally licensed independent agency Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason provides trusted guidance across multiple specialties—including fixed and indexed annuities, long-term care planning, personal and business disability insurance, life insurance solutions, Group Health, and short-term health coverage. Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains active contracts with over 100 highly rated insurance carriers, ensuring clients have access to a broad and competitive marketplace.
His practical, education-first approach has earned recognition in publications such as VoyageATL, as well as his agency's featured coverage in Kiplinger— highlighting his commitment to financial clarity and client-focused planning. Drawing on deep product knowledge and years of hands-on field experience, Jason helps clients evaluate carriers, compare strategies, and build retirement and protection plans that are both secure and cost-efficient. Visitors who want to explore current annuity rates and compare options across multiple insurers can also use this annuity quote and comparison tool.
Explore More Annuity Options: Browse our complete guide to What Is a Fixed Annuity? — covering fixed annuities, MYGAs, laddering strategies & conservative growth options from 100+ carriers.
Editorial Standards: Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure accuracy, clarity, and independence in all content. Learn more about our editorial standards and commitment to transparency.
