How are Dividends Paid in Life Insurance
How are Dividends Paid in Life Insurance
Jason Stolz CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
How are dividends paid in life insurance? If you own a participating whole life policy — or are considering one — this question is central to understanding how your policy actually performs over time. Dividends are often described as a “return of premium,” but that phrase barely scratches the surface. In reality, dividends influence your cash value growth, death benefit expansion, long-term premium flexibility, retirement income potential, estate planning efficiency, and even how your policy interacts with tax rules like modified endowment contract limits. Understanding how dividends are paid, what determines them, and how to elect the right dividend option can dramatically change the outcome of your policy over decades. At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we work with families, professionals, retirees, and business owners who want clarity — not marketing hype — about how participating life insurance works. Whether you’re comparing whole life to term coverage using our term life insurance calculator, exploring advanced strategies like those covered in life insurance strategies the wealthy use, or reviewing an in-force policy you purchased years ago, dividends deserve careful attention. They are not guaranteed, they are not identical from company to company, and they are not interchangeable with interest rates or investment returns.
See Real-Term Rates Side by Side
Use the quoter below to explore term and permanent life insurance coverage as a starting baseline. Then we’ll work through the specific dividend option structure and participating carrier comparison that fits your situation.
Life Insurance Quoter
What Is a Participating Policy — And Why Only Some Policies Pay Dividends
Not all life insurance policies pay dividends. Basic term insurance — often used for income replacement, mortgage protection, or short-term needs — does not typically include dividends. If your primary goal is affordable temporary protection, the focus is on premium per dollar of death benefit rather than dividend performance. Dividends are most commonly associated with participating whole life insurance issued by mutual insurance companies. This distinction matters more than most buyers realize. A mutual insurance company is technically owned by its policyholders rather than outside shareholders. When the company generates surplus beyond what it needs to maintain reserves and fund operations, some portion of that surplus may be distributed back to participating policyowners as dividends. A stock insurance company — owned by external shareholders — may issue participating policies, but the competitive dynamics of dividend distribution are different because the company also has obligations to shareholders. For buyers specifically seeking dividend-paying whole life coverage, comparing mutual company carriers against stock company carriers is a meaningful part of the product evaluation. The consistency of mutual company dividend histories — and the structural commitment to policyowner benefit — is one reason many whole life buyers specifically seek out mutual company carriers.
Understanding whether a policy is “participating” is the threshold question. Participating policies have a contractual right to receive dividends when declared. Non-participating policies do not participate in the company’s experience, and the pricing is typically different to reflect the absence of that variable. When evaluating any whole life policy, confirming whether it is participating — and understanding the carrier’s historical dividend scale and dividend payment history — is a fundamental due diligence step before any purchase decision. For buyers who are also evaluating whether whole life’s dividend component makes it a meaningful alternative to other financial tools, our resource on whether life insurance is a good investment covers the honest comparison between whole life dividend performance and alternative accumulation approaches — including when the tax-advantaged structure and forced savings mechanism of participating whole life provides genuine advantages and when it does not.
What Drives Life Insurance Dividends — The Three-Factor Framework
While each insurance company uses its own internal methodology, most dividend scales are influenced by three primary factors that interact to determine the size of the annual dividend declared. Understanding these three factors — and how they relate to each other — helps policyowners interpret dividend scale changes and evaluate carrier performance over time.
| Dividend Driver | What It Measures | How Better Results Support Dividends | Key Risk to Dividends | Policyowner Influence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment Performance | How much the insurer earns on invested premiums vs. what was projected when policies were originally priced | Higher portfolio yields on bonds and other reserves create surplus above projected minimums, contributing to dividend capacity | Prolonged low interest rate environments compress portfolio yields, reducing available surplus for dividends; older policies priced at higher yield assumptions may feel the impact most | None directly — insurer manages the portfolio; however, carrier selection matters: some carriers have more conservative investment portfolios that are more stable across rate cycles |
| Mortality Experience | Whether the insured population experiences fewer deaths than actuarially projected when policies were priced | Fewer-than-expected claims reduce the amount the insurer pays out, leaving more surplus available for potential distribution as dividends | Unusual mortality events (pandemics, catastrophic events) can produce significantly higher-than-expected claims, reducing dividend capacity | Some — underwriting quality matters. Carriers with more rigorous underwriting historically maintain better mortality experience than carriers that underwrite more liberally to grow market share |
| Operating Expenses | Whether the insurer administers policies, processes claims, and runs operations more efficiently than assumed in the original pricing model | Operating more efficiently than assumed creates additional surplus that can contribute to dividend capacity alongside investment and mortality experience | Rising administrative costs, technology investments, or regulatory compliance burdens can increase expenses above assumptions, reducing surplus | None directly — reflects the insurer’s organizational efficiency, which is one reason evaluating carrier financial management alongside dividend history is a meaningful pre-purchase step |
The combined effect of these three factors — investment performance, mortality experience, and operating expenses — determines the dividend scale declared for each year. Your individual dividend is then calculated based on your policy’s face amount, duration, cash value, and dividend class (which varies by policy design and product generation). This is why two policyholders at the same company with nominally similar policies can receive different dividends if their policies were issued in different years or under different product designs — the underlying pricing assumptions and dividend classes differ even within the same carrier’s portfolio.
The Five Dividend Election Options — How Each Changes Your Policy Trajectory
Understanding how dividends are paid requires looking beyond the calculation and into the election options available to you. Most participating whole life policies allow you to choose how your dividends are used, and these elections can often be changed over time. The long-term impact of your choice is substantial — compounding over decades means early dividend elections can produce dramatically different outcomes by retirement or end of policy. The table below maps each option against the factors that matter most for long-term policy performance.
| Dividend Option | How It Works | Effect on Cash Value | Effect on Death Benefit | Tax Consideration | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash Payment | Insurer issues a check or direct deposit for the annual dividend amount | Grows more slowly — dividends not reinvested into the policy | Does not increase — base contract death benefit only | Generally tax-free up to cumulative premium paid (cost basis); amounts exceeding basis may be taxable as ordinary income | Retirees supplementing income; policyowners who have other growth vehicles and want liquidity over compounding |
| Premium Reduction | Dividends offset the scheduled annual premium, reducing out-of-pocket cost | Grows more slowly than PUA option — dividends reduce premium rather than purchasing additional coverage | Does not increase — base contract death benefit only | Premium reductions are generally received tax-free as return of premium up to cost basis | Policyowners approaching retirement who want to maintain coverage while reducing cash-flow obligations; policies that are maturing and approaching premium offset |
| Paid-Up Additions (PUAs) | Each dividend purchases a small, fully paid-up piece of additional whole life coverage; PUAs themselves can earn future dividends | Highest long-term growth — compound effect as PUAs generate their own dividends; cash value accelerates over time | Increases meaningfully over time — each PUA adds permanent death benefit alongside cash value | PUA purchases must stay within MEC limits; consult advisor before significantly increasing PUAs to avoid inadvertently triggering modified endowment contract status | Long-term wealth building; retirement income accumulation; high-cash-value strategies; Be Your Own Banker designs; estate planning |
| Accumulate at Interest | Dividends remain on deposit with the insurer in a side account earning declared interest rates | Accumulation in a side account — separate from policy cash value, can be withdrawn but does not compound within the policy’s structure | Does not increase base death benefit — accumulated funds are a separate side account | Interest earned on accumulated dividends is taxable annually as ordinary income, even if not withdrawn — one of the less tax-efficient options | Policyowners who want dividends preserved for future access but are uncertain about timing; short-term parking before redirecting to PUAs or cash |
| Apply to Policy Loan | Dividends reduce outstanding loan balance or offset accruing loan interest, preventing compounding loan growth | Indirectly — preserving cash value by preventing loan erosion rather than growing additional value | Indirectly — preventing loan balance from growing protects the net death benefit available to beneficiaries | Loan repayment using dividends generally does not create additional taxable events; underlying loan mechanics (non-MEC policy) should be confirmed | Policies with outstanding loans where loan interest is accruing; long-term income distribution designs where managing loan balance is important to policy sustainability |
Paid-Up Additions — The Compounding Engine of Participating Whole Life
Paid-up additions are often considered the most powerful dividend election for long-term growth, and understanding why requires understanding the compounding mechanism they create. When you elect PUAs, each dividend purchases a small, fully paid-up piece of additional whole life coverage — meaning that additional coverage requires no future premium payments to remain in force. That additional coverage immediately increases both the death benefit and the cash value. Even more importantly, those paid-up additions themselves are participating coverage that can earn future dividends. The dividend for next year is therefore calculated on a larger base — which means the next year’s dividend can purchase more PUAs, which further increase the base, which generates an even larger subsequent dividend. This compound effect — where each year’s dividend builds a foundation for the next year’s dividend — is why long-term PUA-focused policies can produce dramatically different results than the same policy with cash or premium reduction elections.
Many of the advanced accumulation-focused whole life designs referenced in wealth-building life insurance strategies rely heavily on paid-up additions to optimize long-term cash value growth. The “Be Your Own Banker” strategy — which uses whole life cash value as a personal banking mechanism — specifically requires robust PUA accumulation to create the accessible cash value pool that the strategy depends on. Our resource on the Be Your Own Banker strategy covers how PUAs interact with the policy loan mechanism to create a private banking system with tax-advantaged growth. The critical design constraint for PUA-focused whole life is the modified endowment contract threshold — adding too many paid-up additions relative to the base policy’s death benefit can push the policy over the MEC limit, changing the tax treatment of loans and withdrawals in ways that undermine the strategy’s benefits. Our resource on what is a modified endowment contract covers exactly where that threshold sits and how to monitor proximity to it as dividends continue to purchase PUAs over time.
Dividend Illustrations vs. Actual Performance — The Critical Distinction
One of the most important concepts for any whole life buyer to understand is the difference between a dividend illustration and the actual dividends their policy will receive. When you apply for a participating whole life policy, you receive an illustration that projects future values based on the carrier’s current dividend scale. That illustration assumes the current dividend scale will remain constant for the illustrated period — which is typically 20, 30, or 40 years into the future. No illustration can predict future dividends with certainty, because future dividends depend on future investment performance, future mortality experience, and future operating efficiency — none of which can be known today. This is why insurance regulations require that illustrations include a guaranteed column (showing only values that are contractually guaranteed regardless of dividends) alongside the non-guaranteed column (showing projected values based on the current dividend scale). The guaranteed column represents the absolute floor — what the policy delivers if no dividends are ever declared. The non-guaranteed column represents what the policy would deliver if the current dividend scale continued indefinitely. Most real-world outcomes fall somewhere between these two extremes, depending on how the carrier’s actual experience compares to its projections over the years the policy remains in force.
Historical dividend consistency is meaningful context — a carrier that has paid dividends every year for 100 consecutive years demonstrates a long-term commitment to policyowner surplus distribution that carries weight in evaluating how future dividends might behave. But historical consistency is not a contractual promise. Even the strongest mutual insurers retain discretion each year to declare the dividend scale they believe is appropriate based on actual results. For buyers evaluating carriers based on dividend history, it is also important to consider whether the historical comparisons are apples-to-apples: a carrier that maintained its dividend scale during a prolonged low-interest-rate environment by drawing on reserves demonstrates different risk management than one that scaled dividends down when rates fell. Understanding the carrier’s approach to maintaining dividend stability — not just whether dividends were maintained — is part of the due diligence process.
Cash Option and Premium Reduction — When They Make Sense
The cash option is the most straightforward dividend election. When you elect cash dividends, the insurer issues a payment that you receive directly. This provides immediate liquidity and flexibility. For retirees or individuals who want supplemental income, this can be appropriate — particularly when the policy’s death benefit and cash value have already grown to a level that satisfies the legacy or financial planning objective, and additional compounding within the policy is less important than near-term cash flow. The key trade-off is that taking dividends as cash means those dividends are not compounding within the policy’s structure, and the policy’s long-term trajectory reflects that choice across the full accumulation period.
While dividends are typically considered a return of premium and may be received income-tax free up to your cost basis, amounts beyond cumulative premiums paid could be taxable as ordinary income. Coordination with a tax professional is important when cash dividends are elected as a supplemental income strategy — particularly if the policy is part of a broader retirement income structure alongside tools like annuities or structured withdrawal plans. Our resource on retirement asset-protection strategies covers how life insurance integrates with the broader retirement income picture — the context in which cash dividend elections most frequently make the most sense for over-50 policyowners. For buyers using premium reduction specifically to ease cash flow in the years approaching retirement, our resource on life insurance over 50 covers how the coverage needs and financial priorities that drive dividend election decisions typically shift at this life stage.
Policy Loans, Dividends, and the Loan Management Relationship
Policy loans and dividends interact in ways that significantly affect the long-term health of a participating whole life policy. When a policyowner borrows against their cash value, the insurer charges loan interest. In most whole life policies, loan interest accrues annually and is added to the outstanding loan balance if not paid. Over time, an unmanaged loan can grow substantially — eroding cash value and reducing the net death benefit available to beneficiaries. Using dividends to offset loan interest prevents this compounding loan growth, which is why many in-force policy management strategies include dividend election changes specifically to address outstanding loans.
The interaction between loans and dividends is particularly important in policies being used for income distribution — such as executive bonus plans, business overhead strategies, or the Be Your Own Banker policy design. In these designs, the policy is structured to be borrowed against systematically for decades. The sustainability of the policy through that distribution period depends significantly on how effectively loan growth is managed relative to dividend income. Our resource on what is premium financing for life insurance covers how premium financing interacts with whole life policy mechanics — a closely related concept where external borrowing is used to fund policy premiums in high-value whole life purchases, creating a more complex interaction between loan structures and dividend income than standard in-force policy loans.
Business Applications of Life Insurance Dividends
Business owners frequently use participating whole life insurance for purposes that specifically depend on dividend performance — making the dividend election decision more consequential than in personal coverage contexts. Executive bonus arrangements where the company funds whole life coverage for key employees as a benefit typically use PUA elections to maximize the cash value accumulation that makes the benefit meaningful to the executive. Split-dollar insurance arrangements — where premium costs are shared between the business and the employee — often involve participating whole life policies where the dividend component affects the economic benefit calculation. Our resource on split-dollar insurance arrangements covers how dividend performance interacts with the economic benefit reporting and premium recovery mechanics of split-dollar designs. For key person coverage using participating whole life — where the company owns the policy, funds it, and receives the death benefit — dividends can offset premium costs over time through premium reduction elections, reducing the effective net cost of maintaining the key person coverage. Our resource on key person life insurance for executives covers the business ownership structures that most commonly combine participating whole life with key person planning objectives. For the broader landscape of how life insurance serves business owners across multiple functions including buy-sell planning, loan protection, and key person coverage, our resource on life insurance for business owners covers how dividend-paying whole life fits within each of those planning contexts. And for businesses or individuals evaluating whether premium financing makes sense for large whole life purchases — where the dividend income eventually helps service the financing arrangement — our resource on premium financing pros and cons covers the specific mechanics and risk considerations of that advanced strategy.
Estate Planning and Dividend Optimization
For estate planning purposes, the PUA election’s impact on death benefit growth is especially meaningful. Each year’s dividends that are reinvested as paid-up additions increase both the cash value and the total death benefit — creating a growing legacy that compounds over the policy’s lifetime. For policyowners who want the policy to serve as an estate liquidity vehicle, ongoing PUA election for as long as possible before switching to cash or premium reduction in late retirement is often the preferred strategy: maximize compounding during the accumulation years, then shift to income-oriented elections when cash flow matters more than continued growth. The combination of increasing death benefit through PUA accumulation and the tax-advantaged nature of life insurance death benefits — which are generally received income-tax-free by beneficiaries under IRC Section 101(a) — makes dividend-compounding whole life one of the more efficient tools in the estate planning toolkit for situations where the planning horizon is long enough to allow the compounding effect to materialize. For buyers who are also coordinating life insurance with estate planning involving a surviving spouse or complex ownership structures, our resource on life insurance planning after divorce covers how ownership structure, beneficiary arrangement, and dividend election interact in policies that are subject to post-divorce financial restructuring.
Changing Your Dividend Election Over Time
In most policies, you can adjust your dividend election as your needs evolve — and this flexibility is one of the features that makes participating whole life more adaptable over a lifetime than its fixed-premium structure might suggest. A common lifecycle pattern is to elect PUAs during working years to maximize long-term compounding, then switch to premium reduction or cash dividends in the retirement transition period when cash flow management becomes a priority. However, changes should be modeled carefully before execution. Altering elections changes future performance projections, and in policies that are approaching MEC limits, adjustments must be evaluated cautiously — adding more PUAs near the limit requires careful monitoring, while switching away from PUAs releases that constraint. For policyowners who want to understand whether their current dividend election is optimized for their current life stage and financial objectives, a complete in-force illustration review comparing different election scenarios is the most useful analytical tool. Our standard service includes this type of review for any existing whole life policy, regardless of which carrier issued it.
Dividends should never be evaluated in isolation. They must be coordinated with your overall coverage strategy. If you are balancing permanent insurance with term coverage for larger income-replacement needs, our term life insurance calculator can help right-size the protection component. If you are using permanent coverage to support education funding, our resource on how to use life insurance to fund a college savings plan covers the specific design considerations for education-focused whole life policies. If you are protecting dependents with long-term needs, coordination with special needs planning is essential — our resource on special needs life insurance planning covers how trust structures, premium funding, and dividend elections interact in policies designed to protect lifelong dependents. If you are protecting a mortgage alongside your permanent coverage, our resource on how to protect your mortgage with life insurance covers how permanent and term coverage serve different functions in the same household protection plan. Each of these goals may influence whether dividends are best reinvested, withdrawn, or redirected — which is why dividend election planning is always part of a broader coverage strategy review rather than a standalone product feature decision. For context on how annuity income and whole life policy dividends can work together as complementary income sources in retirement planning, our resource on how annuity payments can fund life insurance premiums covers the integration approach that allows retirement income from annuities to maintain whole life coverage without creating budget strain. And for buyers specifically evaluating the relative merits of whole life dividends against other financial instruments in a comprehensive financial plan, our resource on what life insurance does not cover clarifies the policy exclusions framework that affects all coverage types — context for understanding where life insurance begins and ends as a financial tool.
Compare Participating Whole Life Options
We compare dividend-paying policies from multiple mutual and stock carriers and model how each dividend option affects your long-term cash value and death benefit — using your specific age, premium budget, and planning objectives.
Request Whole Life Dividend Quotes Call 800-533-5969Related Life Insurance Planning Guides
Advanced whole life strategies, MEC rules, college funding, and special needs planning resources that connect to dividend election decisions.
Financial Protection Essentials
Carrier reviews, senior burial planning, high-risk underwriting guidance, and final expense planning tools for a complete protection picture.
Talk With an Advisor Today
Choose how you’d like to connect—call or message us, then book a time that works for you.
Schedule here:
calendly.com/jason-dibcompanies/diversified-quotes
Licensed in all 50 states • Fiduciary, family-owned since 1980
FAQs: How Are Dividends Paid in Life Insurance?
Are life insurance dividends guaranteed?
No. Life insurance dividends are not guaranteed, even if a company has paid them consistently for many years. Dividends are declared annually by the insurer’s board of directors based on actual results across three factors: investment performance of the company’s portfolio, mortality experience (whether more or fewer claims were paid than actuarially projected), and operating efficiency. When actual results across these three factors exceed the conservative assumptions built into the original policy pricing, the insurer may generate surplus that supports a dividend. When results are below expectations — as can happen in prolonged low-interest-rate environments, unusual mortality events, or periods of higher-than-projected operating costs — dividend scales may be reduced or, in extreme cases, dividends may not be declared at all. Historical consistency of dividend payments is meaningful context for evaluating a carrier’s stability and commitment to policyowner distribution of surplus, but it is not a contractual promise about future dividends.
How does the company decide how much dividend I receive?
Your individual dividend is calculated by applying the company’s declared dividend scale to your specific policy’s characteristics. The company first determines the overall dividend fund available for distribution based on total surplus from investment performance, mortality experience, and expense management. That fund is then allocated to individual policies based on factors that include: the face amount of coverage, the policy’s duration (how long it has been in force), the cash value that has accumulated, and the policy’s dividend class (which varies by product generation and policy design). Policies that have been in force longer and have accumulated more cash value typically receive larger dividends in absolute terms, even if the dividend rate as a percentage of cash value is similar across policies. Two policyowners at the same company with nominally similar policies can receive different dividends if their policies were issued under different product generations with different pricing assumptions and dividend class assignments.
What are the most common dividend options?
The five most common dividend options are: taking dividends in cash (the insurer pays you directly), using dividends to reduce or fully offset the scheduled premium (premium reduction), purchasing paid-up additions (PUAs — small fully-paid-up increments of additional whole life coverage), leaving dividends on deposit with the insurer to accumulate at declared interest rates (accumulate at interest), and applying dividends toward outstanding policy loans. Most participating policies allow policyowners to change their dividend election over time as needs evolve — for example, moving from paid-up additions during the accumulation years to cash or premium reduction in retirement. The long-term impact of these elections compounds substantially over the life of the policy, so understanding the trade-offs before making an election — and reviewing the election periodically as circumstances change — is an important aspect of policy management.
Which dividend option usually builds the most long-term value?
Paid-up additions (PUAs) generally produce the strongest long-term cash value and death benefit growth for most policyowners with long time horizons, because of the compounding mechanism they create. Each year’s dividend purchases additional paid-up whole life coverage that itself earns future dividends — creating a compounding effect where each year’s dividend builds a larger base for the following year’s dividend calculation. Over 20 to 30 years, the difference between a policy that has consistently reinvested dividends as PUAs versus one that has taken cash or applied dividends to premium reduction can be substantial in both cash value and death benefit. That said, PUAs are not always the best choice — policyowners who need current income, who are managing loan balances, or who want to ease the premium burden in retirement may find that cash or premium reduction elections better serve their actual financial situation. The “best” option is the one that aligns with the specific goals, time horizon, and financial circumstances of the individual policyowner at each stage of the policy’s life.
Can I switch my dividend option later?
In most policies, yes — dividend elections can be changed by submitting a request to the insurer, typically in writing. Changes generally take effect at the next policy anniversary following the request. Before changing a dividend election, it is important to model the impact on future policy performance using an in-force illustration that shows projected values under the new election. In policies that are near the modified endowment contract threshold, increasing paid-up additions requires careful monitoring to ensure the policy does not inadvertently cross the MEC limit — which would change the tax treatment of loans and withdrawals. For policies that have been accumulating at interest and have a significant side account balance, redirecting future dividends to PUAs does not retroactively change how the accumulated dividends on deposit are handled — those remain in the side account until specifically redirected or withdrawn. Election changes should be evaluated in the context of the full policy picture, not as isolated decisions.
Are dividends from life insurance taxable?
Life insurance dividends are generally treated as a return of premium up to the policyowner’s cumulative cost basis — the total of all premiums paid. Dividends received up to that basis are generally income-tax free because they are considered a return of money that was already paid with after-tax dollars. Once cumulative dividends received in cash exceed the total premiums paid, amounts beyond that basis become taxable as ordinary income. For the accumulate-at-interest election, interest earned on dividends left on deposit with the insurer is taxable annually as ordinary income, even if the funds are not withdrawn — this is one of the less tax-efficient dividend options for policyowners in higher tax brackets. Dividend elections that reinvest dividends into paid-up additions or apply them to premium reduction generally avoid current taxation until there is an actual distribution. The specific tax treatment for any individual policy should be reviewed with a qualified tax professional, particularly for policies that have been in force for decades and where the cost basis calculation has become complex.
Do term life policies pay dividends?
Most standard term life insurance policies do not pay dividends. Basic level term insurance is typically non-participating — it provides a fixed death benefit for a defined period at a fixed premium, without the participating policy structure that creates dividend eligibility. Some insurance companies offer “participating” term insurance where policyholders technically have dividend eligibility, but dividends on term policies are generally much smaller and less impactful than dividends on whole life policies because there is no accumulated cash value base on which dividends are calculated. If your primary goal is affordable temporary protection for income replacement, mortgage payoff, or short-term needs, term insurance remains the most cost-efficient tool for that purpose regardless of its non-participating status. The dividend discussion becomes relevant when you are specifically evaluating participating whole life as part of a permanent coverage, retirement accumulation, or estate planning strategy.
Can dividends be used to pay off policy loans?
Yes. Many participating whole life policies allow dividends to be applied toward outstanding policy loan interest or principal. This can be an effective strategy for managing loan balances in policies where funds have been borrowed against the cash value — whether for retirement income distributions, business needs, education funding, or other purposes. The critical problem with unmanaged policy loans is that loan interest accrues and compounds: if the interest is not paid, it is added to the loan principal, which then generates additional interest the following year. In a policy with a significant loan balance and no other management strategy, this compounding can eventually grow to a point where it threatens the policy’s long-term viability. Applying dividends to offset loan interest prevents the compounding from accelerating, preserving the policy’s health over the distribution period. This approach is particularly important in policies designed for long-term income distribution, such as the Be Your Own Banker design or executive income arrangements, where the loan-and-repayment cycle is central to the strategy’s function.
What happens if the company reduces its dividend scale?
If the company reduces its dividend scale, future dividends are likely to be smaller than projected in the original illustration — which can slow cash value growth, reduce how much premium can be offset through dividend elections, and lower the projected trajectory of paid-up additions accumulation. However, the guaranteed values in the policy — the guaranteed death benefit, the guaranteed cash value based on guaranteed interest rates, and the guaranteed premium — are not affected by dividend scale changes. The guaranteed column of your policy illustration represents the absolute floor that the policy delivers entirely from contractual obligations, independent of dividends. Dividend scale reductions affect the non-guaranteed projections, not the contractual guarantees. Policyowners who want to understand how a dividend scale reduction would affect their specific policy should request an in-force illustration using a lower dividend scale assumption — many insurance companies can provide illustrations at reduced dividend scales to help policyowners model stress scenarios.
How can I tell if I’m using the right dividend option?
The best way to evaluate whether your current dividend election is optimized is to request an in-force illustration and compare different dividend elections side by side. An in-force illustration shows your policy’s current status — actual cash value, actual death benefit, any outstanding loans — and projects forward based on different dividend election assumptions. Seeing the 10-year, 20-year, and end-of-life projections under your current election versus alternative elections allows you to quantify the long-term impact of a change before making it. The right election is not determined by which option grows fastest in isolation — it is determined by which option best serves your actual financial goals given your current age, financial situation, tax position, and planning objectives. A 40-year-old with a 30-year time horizon before needing cash from the policy is in a very different position than a 65-year-old who is actively drawing on the policy’s accumulated value. Working with an independent advisor who can review the in-force illustration and model alternative elections against your current circumstances gives you the most complete picture for making this decision with confidence.
About the Author:
Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA and Chief Underwriter at Diversified Insurance Brokers (NPN 20471358), is a senior insurance and retirement professional with more than 25 years of real-world experience helping individuals, families, and business owners protect their income, assets, and long-term financial stability. As a long-time partner of the nationally licensed independent agency Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason provides trusted guidance across multiple specialties—including fixed and indexed annuities, long-term care planning, personal and business disability insurance, life insurance solutions, Group Health, Travel Medical and Evacuation Insurance, and short-term health coverage. Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains active contracts with over 100 highly rated insurance carriers, ensuring clients have access to a broad and competitive marketplace.
His practical, education-first approach has earned recognition in publications such as VoyageATL, and contributions from his agency featured in Kiplinger and GoBankingRates— highlighting his commitment to financial clarity and client-focused planning. Drawing on deep product knowledge and years of hands-on field experience, Jason helps clients evaluate carriers, compare strategies, and build retirement and protection plans that are both secure and cost-efficient. Visitors who want to explore current annuity rates and compare options across multiple insurers can also use this annuity quote and comparison tool.
Explore More Life Insurance Options: Browse our complete guide to Life Insurance Planning & Education — covering how to buy, costs, calculators, retirement planning & buying guides from 100+ carriers.
Last Reviewed: May 30, 2026 |
Reviewed by: Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
Chief Underwriter, Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. | NPN: 20471358 | Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. — Licensed in all 50 states
Fact Checked by: Tonia Pettitt, CMIP©
Medicare Specialist, Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. | NPN: 14374308 | Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. — Licensed in all 50 states
Editorial Standards: Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure accuracy, clarity, and independence in all content. Learn more about our editorial standards and commitment to transparency.
