Is Trellis Financial a Good Insurance Company

Is Trellis Financial a Good Insurance Company:  Trellis Financial is a newer name in the annuity market, and when a carrier you have not heard of shows up with headline numbers as aggressive as a 34% benefit base bonus and a 10% roll-up, the right instinct is to ask hard questions before you get excited. At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we have gone through the Perennial 10 contract mechanics line by line, reconciled the published income figures against the underlying formula, and can tell you exactly what this product does and does not do. Here is the short version: Trellis is a legitimate carrier backed by an established issuing company with a strong financial strength rating, and the Perennial 10 is a genuinely competitive lifetime income product for a specific kind of buyer. It is also a product whose headline numbers are widely misunderstood, including by people selling it. The bonus and the roll-up are real, but they are not what most consumers assume they are, and understanding that distinction is the difference between buying this contract for the right reason and buying it for the wrong one.

Want to see what the Perennial 10 would actually pay you — and how it compares to the rest of the market?
Request a Personalized Illustration

The Perennial 10 is a fixed indexed annuity with a lifetime income benefit built in rather than added as an optional rider. That structural choice tells you what the product is designed to do. This is an income vehicle first and an accumulation vehicle second, and any honest evaluation has to judge it on the income it produces rather than on the growth it might deliver. Where the Perennial 10 is genuinely strong is in a specific and narrow window: producing high guaranteed lifetime income for someone who wants that income relatively soon rather than decades from now. Income can begin as early as thirty days after the contract is issued, which is unusual, and the combination of a large day-one bonus with a substantial roll-up means the income calculation base is meaningfully larger than the premium from the very beginning.

Where it demands scrutiny is everywhere the marketing gets loose. A 34% bonus is not 34% added to your money. A 10% roll-up is not a 10% return. The charge for the income benefit is calculated on one value and deducted from another, which matters more than most buyers realize. And a ten-year surrender schedule on a contract designed to start paying income in thirty days creates a liquidity profile that suits some people very well and others very poorly. None of these are defects. They are simply how this class of product works, and a buyer who understands them is in a position to use the contract well.

This review covers who Trellis Financial is and who actually stands behind the contract, exactly how the benefit base is built and why the distinction between it and your account value is the single most important thing on this page, how the income calculation works, the enhanced income feature for health events, the growth side of the contract, the full cost and liquidity picture, and an honest assessment of who this product fits and who it does not. Our goal is that by the end you can evaluate a Perennial 10 illustration on its merits rather than on its headline percentages.

Who Is Trellis Financial, and Who Stands Behind the Contract?

Trellis Financial positions itself as a modern annuity carrier built by people who spent their careers inside established annuity companies and consulting firms — designing products, running operations, and advising on strategy — and who decided to build a company where the product design decisions are made in-house rather than by outside partners. That is the company’s own framing, and whether it produces better outcomes for consumers is something time will demonstrate rather than something a brochure can prove. What we can evaluate is the structure, and the structure is more conventional than the newness suggests.

The distinction that matters most to you as a contract owner is this: Trellis has partnered with Plateau Insurance Company, and Plateau is the licensed insurance company that issues the policy and assumes the contractual obligations. This is a common and entirely legitimate arrangement in the annuity industry, but it means the promise behind your contract runs to the issuing company rather than to the brand on the brochure. When you evaluate the financial strength behind a Perennial 10, the issuing company is the relevant entity, and Plateau brings roughly four and a half decades of operating history.

The financial strength rating associated with the product is A− (Excellent) from AM Best. That is a solid rating in the secure range, indicating an excellent ability to meet ongoing insurance obligations. It is not the top of the scale, and buyers who insist on the very highest ratings available in the market will find carriers rated above it — but A− is genuinely respectable and well within the range most advisors consider appropriate for an income annuity. Because ratings are reviewed and can change, and because the rating scale is easy to misread, our explanation of what an insurance company’s AM Best rating actually means is worth reading before you weigh it, and we would encourage confirming the current rating at the time you apply.

There is a second layer of protection worth understanding. Annuity guarantees are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company and, secondarily, by the guaranty association of your state, which provides a defined level of coverage if a carrier fails. Those coverage limits vary by state and are worth knowing about generally rather than relying on, since they function as a backstop rather than a primary protection. Our overview of the state guaranty association system explains how it works, and our discussion of what “guaranteed” really means in an annuity puts the whole question of carrier backing in context.

One practical note on availability: the Perennial 10 is not offered in every state. At the time of writing it is unavailable in a handful of jurisdictions, and California has its own version of the contract with a different surrender schedule and without the enhanced income feature described below. State availability changes as products get filed and approved, so confirming that the product is available where you live is a first-step question rather than an afterthought.

Perennial 10 at a Glance

The Most Important Thing on This Page: Two Values, Not One

If you take away only one concept from this review, make it this one. A Perennial 10 contract tracks two entirely separate values, and confusing them is the single most common and most costly misunderstanding in this category of annuity.

The contract value is your actual money. It is what grows through fixed or indexed interest crediting, what you can surrender for, what charges are deducted from, and what your beneficiaries receive as a death benefit. It is the real, spendable account.

The benefit base is a calculation figure used for one purpose only: determining how much lifetime income you will receive. It is not a bank account. It has no cash value. It is not available at death, not available at surrender, and cannot be taken as a lump sum under any circumstance. It exists solely to be multiplied by a withdrawal percentage to produce your annual income.

This is why the headline numbers require translation. A 34% bonus credited on day one goes to the benefit base — not to your money. A 10% roll-up increases the benefit base — not your money. If you fund this contract and then change your mind and surrender it, none of that bonus or roll-up is there. If you die before starting income, your beneficiaries receive the contract value, and the benefit base disappears entirely. What the bonus and roll-up genuinely purchase is a larger income stream, and that income stream is the only way to realize their value.

None of this is hidden, and it is not unique to Trellis — every roll-up-and-bonus income annuity works this way. But the marketing language across the industry consistently blurs the line, and consumers routinely walk away believing they received a 34% return on day one. They did not. They received a substantially enhanced income calculation, which is genuinely valuable if income is what they want, and worth nothing at all if it is not. Our overview of how annuity income bonuses actually work covers this distinction across products, and our explanation of how annuity income riders function puts the benefit-base concept in its broader context.

How the Benefit Base Is Actually Built

The benefit base grows in three defined ways, and the mechanics are worth understanding precisely because they let you evaluate an illustration rather than trust it.

The day-one bonus. On the contract effective date, the benefit base is set to your initial premium plus a bonus equal to 34% of that premium. So the income calculation starts at 134% of what you put in, immediately, before any growth at all. For a product designed around near-term income, this front-loading is the most valuable single feature, because it applies in full even if you turn income on almost right away.

The roll-up. The benefit base then grows at a rate of 10% of the initial premium each year, credited daily, continuing for up to ten years or until lifetime withdrawals begin, whichever comes first. The critical technical detail — and the one most often described imprecisely — is that this roll-up is calculated on the initial premium, not on the growing benefit base. That makes it simple growth rather than compound growth. Each year adds the same fixed amount rather than an accelerating one. This is not a criticism; a 10% simple roll-up is a strong rate. But it should not be confused with 10% compounding, which would produce a dramatically different result over ten years, and anyone presenting it that way is describing the product incorrectly.

The step-up. On each contract anniversary before income begins, if your contract value has grown to exceed your benefit base, the benefit base automatically steps up to match the higher contract value. This is an automatic feature requiring no election, though it is unavailable in any year in which excess withdrawals were taken. In practice, given how large the bonus makes the starting benefit base, the contract value would need exceptional index performance to overtake it — so the step-up should be understood as a genuine but unlikely upside rather than a feature to count on.

Putting the first two together produces a formula you can verify yourself: the benefit base equals your premium multiplied by one, plus the 34% bonus, plus 10% for each year you wait. Defer a full ten years and the benefit base reaches 234% of your original premium. Turn income on after two years and it is 154%. Turn it on after thirty days and it is roughly 135%. We have reconciled this formula against the published income figures across every issue age and deferral period, and it holds exactly — which is a useful thing to know, because it means you can sanity-check any illustration you are shown rather than taking it on faith.

Want us to run the numbers for your age, premium, and income start date?
Get Your Personalized Analysis

How Your Income Is Calculated

Once you decide to begin lifetime withdrawals, your annual income is determined by multiplying your benefit base by a lifetime withdrawal percentage tied to your attained age at the time income starts. Older attained age produces a higher percentage, which is standard across income annuities and reflects the shorter expected payout period.

The withdrawal percentages rise steadily with age across the eligible range, beginning in the mid-four-percent territory for the youngest eligible owners and climbing through the five, six, seven, and eight percent bands as attained age increases into the seventies, eighties, and beyond. If you elect joint income covering both spouses, the percentage is reduced by half a percentage point and is based on the younger spouse’s attained age — a meaningful consideration for couples with an age gap, since the younger life drives the calculation.

This creates the central strategic tension in the product, and it is worth thinking through carefully. Waiting increases your benefit base through the roll-up, and it increases your withdrawal percentage through attained age. Both push income higher. But waiting also means years without income, and the roll-up stops entirely at ten years. Meanwhile the income charge is being deducted from your contract value the whole time. The right answer depends on whether you actually need income now, what other income sources you have, and how the numbers model out — which is precisely the kind of comparison worth running before you commit rather than after.

Two features add real value to the income promise. The income continues for life even if the contract value is fully depleted, which is the core guarantee and the reason the product exists. And spousal continuation is automatically included, so a surviving spouse who is the primary beneficiary can choose to continue the contract rather than being forced to take a distribution. For readers weighing income mechanics generally, our comparison of annuitization versus lifetime withdrawals explains why a withdrawal-based structure like this one preserves flexibility that traditional annuitization does not, and our overview of lifetime income annuities covers the broader category.

The Enhanced Income Feature

The Perennial 10 includes a benefit that increases your income substantially if you experience a qualifying health event, and it is one of the more meaningful features in the contract because it addresses the moment when retirement income needs typically spike.

After a three-year waiting period, if you become confined to an eligible nursing home for at least ninety consecutive days, or are diagnosed with a terminal illness carrying a life expectancy of twelve months or less, your lifetime withdrawal amount can be increased. For single-life income the multiplier doubles your payment; for joint-life income it increases the payment by half. The enhanced amount can continue for up to five years, or until the contract value reaches zero, whichever comes first.

Two limitations deserve emphasis. The enhancement is capped at five years rather than continuing for life, and it ends earlier if the contract value depletes — so it functions as a bridge through a period of elevated expense rather than a permanent uplift. And it is not available in California, where the contract is issued without this feature. Anyone evaluating this product partly for its long-term care utility should understand both constraints clearly, and should not treat this benefit as a substitute for dedicated long-term care coverage, which is a different product solving a broader problem.

The Growth Side: How the Contract Value Earns Interest

While the income benefit is the headline, your contract value is the money that actually belongs to you, so how it grows matters — particularly for the death benefit and for any surrender value.

The Perennial 10 offers a fixed account crediting a declared interest rate, with interest credited daily and a new rate declared each contract year. Alongside it are several index-linked crediting strategies using annual point-to-point measurement, built on the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100, available in both cap-limited and participation-rate versions, along with a volatility-controlled index strategy offered with a participation rate. You can allocate across strategies and change your allocations each year.

Understanding the two limiting mechanisms is essential to evaluating any indexed annuity. A cap rate sets the maximum interest you can be credited for the period regardless of how far the index rises. A participation rate instead credits you a defined percentage of the index’s gain with no ceiling, which behaves very differently in a strong market year. The volatility-controlled strategy typically carries a higher participation rate precisely because the underlying index is engineered to move less. Our explanation of how annuities earn interest covers why these mechanisms exist and how insurers use them in place of an explicit fee.

Two honest points about the growth side. First, the declared caps, participation rates, and fixed rate are set by the carrier and change over time, so any figures you see quoted are current rather than guaranteed, and confirming them at the time you apply is essential. Second, and more importantly for setting expectations: in a contract where an income charge is deducted annually from the contract value, the realistic function of index crediting is to slow the depletion of your account value rather than to grow it substantially. Buyers who expect meaningful accumulation from this product have chosen the wrong tool. Your principal is protected from market losses — index declines cannot reduce your contract value — but this is an income contract, and the growth features support that purpose rather than competing with it. If accumulation is genuinely your goal, a different structure serves you better, and our overview of fixed indexed annuities generally covers the accumulation-focused alternatives.

The Full Cost and Liquidity Picture

Every annuity has costs, and the honest way to evaluate one is to understand all of them together rather than focusing on whichever number the brochure emphasizes.

The income charge is the primary explicit cost, and its structure deserves careful attention. Before you activate lifetime withdrawals the charge is one-half of one percent; after activation it rises to one and a half percent. Both are calculated as a percentage of the benefit base but deducted from the contract value. Because the benefit base is substantially larger than the contract value — that is the entire point of the bonus and roll-up — the effective drag on your actual account is proportionally greater than the stated percentage suggests. This is standard construction for income-focused indexed annuities and it is fully disclosed, but it is frequently glossed over, and it is the main reason contract values in these products tend to erode once income begins. If your intention is to use the income for life, that erosion is largely irrelevant to you. If you were counting on a residual account value, it matters a great deal.

Surrender charges apply for ten years, beginning in the high single digits and declining annually to a nominal amount in the final year before disappearing entirely. The California version of the contract carries a slightly lower schedule. During the surrender period a market value adjustment also applies to withdrawals subject to a surrender charge, and it can increase or decrease the amount you receive depending on how interest rates have moved since you purchased. The adjustment does not apply after the surrender period ends.

Liquidity features are more generous than the surrender schedule alone implies. In the first contract year you may withdraw interest earned after the first thirty days, or your required minimum distribution if the contract is tax-qualified. From the second year onward you may withdraw up to ten percent of the contract value annually, or your required minimum distribution, without penalty. Required minimum distributions are treated as free withdrawals and can begin immediately on a qualified contract, which is a genuinely useful feature for buyers using retirement account money.

Hardship access is available in two circumstances. After a ninety-day waiting period, up to the full contract value can be withdrawn if the owner becomes confined to an eligible nursing home for at least ninety consecutive days, or is diagnosed with a terminal illness with a life expectancy of twelve months or less. Both carry eligibility conditions — the confinement or diagnosis must occur after the contract takes effect — and neither is available in California.

The death benefit equals the full contract value, passes to beneficiaries outside of probate, and a spouse named as primary beneficiary may continue the contract instead. Note again what this means: the benefit base, however large it has grown, is not part of the death benefit. This contract is built to pay income to a living owner, not to maximize a legacy.

Who the Perennial 10 Genuinely Fits — and Who It Does Not

A carrier review is only useful if it tells you whether the product is right for you, so here is our honest assessment.

This product fits well if guaranteed lifetime income is your primary objective and you want that income to begin relatively soon. The combination of a large day-one bonus and the ability to start income after thirty days makes the Perennial 10 unusually strong in the short-deferral window, and buyers in the early-to-mid retirement age range who want income within the next several years are the clearest fit. It also fits well if you have money you can genuinely commit for a decade, if you value the certainty of income you cannot outlive over the possibility of higher returns elsewhere, and if you are comfortable with the trade that the money funding this income is not money you will be leaving as a large legacy.

This product fits poorly if you are primarily seeking accumulation, because the income charge and the crediting limits mean this is not built to grow your account meaningfully. It fits poorly if you might need substantial liquidity within ten years, since the surrender schedule is long and the free-withdrawal allowance, while reasonable, will not cover a large unexpected need. It fits poorly if maximizing what you leave to heirs is the goal, since beneficiaries receive contract value rather than benefit base. And it fits poorly if you were attracted primarily by the 34% figure and expected it to be your money — in which case the product is not wrong, but your understanding of it was, and buying on that basis leads to disappointment.

There is also a category of buyer for whom this product might be right but a different structure might be better, and that comparison is worth making. If you want maximum guaranteed income and do not need liquidity or a death benefit at all, a straightforward income annuity often produces a higher payment per dollar because it carries no ongoing charge. If you want protected growth with optional income later, a different indexed annuity design may serve you better. If you simply want a guaranteed rate with no complexity, a multi-year guaranteed annuity is a far simpler instrument. The question is never whether a product is good in the abstract but whether it is the best available answer to your specific objective, which is the core of genuine annuity suitability.

How We Evaluate This Product for Clients

We know this contract thoroughly — we have reconciled its income mechanics against the published figures and can explain every moving part of it — and that expertise is exactly why we will not recommend it universally.

Our process starts with your objective rather than the product. If you tell us you want guaranteed income beginning soon, the Perennial 10 belongs in the comparison and may well win it. If you tell us you want growth, liquidity, or a maximized legacy, we will say plainly that this is the wrong instrument and show you what fits instead. That honesty is the entire value of an independent brokerage: we represent many carriers, we are compensated comparably regardless of where a case is placed, and we have no reason to steer you toward any particular contract except that it genuinely serves you best.

When the Perennial 10 is a candidate, we model it properly. We run the actual income at your age, your premium, and each realistic income start date, so you can see the trade-off between waiting and starting rather than guessing at it. We compare that income against competing income products across the carriers we represent, because the only meaningful test of an income annuity is how much guaranteed income it produces per dollar committed relative to the alternatives — and a strong headline bonus does not automatically win that comparison. We check the surrender schedule against your actual liquidity needs. And we explain the two-value structure until we are confident you understand exactly what you are buying, because a client who understands the contract is a client who will be satisfied with it years from now.

If you are funding this from an existing annuity, we handle the exchange mechanics carefully, since a 1035 exchange preserves tax deferral only if it is executed correctly, and surrender costs on the existing contract have to be weighed against the benefit of moving. If you are using qualified retirement money, the tax treatment differs from non-qualified funds in ways that affect your planning. And if you have already been presented a Perennial 10 illustration by someone else and want an independent read on whether it is genuinely your best option, that is exactly what our second-opinion review is for — including the very real possibility that we tell you the proposal in front of you is a good one.

Ready to see how the Perennial 10 compares against the rest of the income annuity market for your situation?
Get Your Free Annuity Comparison