Best Annuities for Profit Sharing Plan Rollover
Best Annuities for Profit Sharing Plan Rollover
Jason Stolz CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we help participants navigating profit sharing plan rollovers make the decision that best serves their long-term retirement security — which begins with a step that is unique to this rollover type and absent from every other account transition in our series: verifying whether the plan holds employer securities, and if so, whether the Net Unrealized Appreciation strategy should be evaluated before a single dollar moves. A profit sharing plan rollover that bypasses the NUA analysis and moves everything to a Traditional IRA may leave a significant and permanently irreversible tax advantage on the table. Rolling employer stock from a qualified plan to a Traditional IRA destroys the NUA tax treatment — confirmed under Internal Revenue Code Section 402(e)(4) and from IRS.gov directly — because the favorable long-term capital gains rate that applies to NUA distributions in-kind from the plan is replaced by ordinary income taxation on every future IRA distribution of that same stock’s value. For a plan participant with highly appreciated employer securities in their profit sharing account, the NUA analysis is not optional planning — it is the prerequisite that determines whether the entire rollover proceeds to an IRA annuity or whether the employer stock component separates in-kind to a taxable brokerage account while only the non-equity portion rolls to the annuity.
Beyond the NUA question, the profit sharing plan rollover has structural characteristics that set it apart from every other rollover type in this series. Unlike a 401(k) or TSP where employee deferrals are a predictable, regular contribution, profit sharing contributions are entirely at the employer’s discretion — made only when the employer chooses to contribute, in amounts that vary based on company profitability and the employer’s allocation formula. A participant may have received maximum contributions in prosperous years and nothing in lean ones, producing an irregular accumulation history that differs from standard paycheck-deduction plans. Unlike a Solo 401(k) or SEP IRA which the participant controls entirely, a profit sharing plan is employer-managed — participants cannot initiate the rollover until a qualifying distributable event occurs: separation from service, plan termination, reaching the plan’s in-service distribution age (if permitted), or reaching age 59½. And unlike a SIMPLE IRA with its two-year waiting period, a profit sharing plan imposes no rollover waiting period — once a qualifying distribution event occurs, the vested balance can be transferred directly to a Traditional IRA (and from there to an annuity) without penalty or delay. Understanding the full pros and cons of annuity structures in the context of a profit sharing plan rollover — specifically how the annuity fits within a broader retirement plan that may already include Social Security, a pension, or other accumulated assets — establishes the analytical foundation before any carrier or product evaluation begins.
This page covers best annuities for a profit sharing plan rollover in sequence: first the NUA determination that must precede the annuity decision, then the vesting verification, then the annuity types that best serve different participant profiles and planning objectives. Our companion pages in the rollover series — covering best annuities for a TSP rollover and best annuities for a Roth IRA rollover — address those account types’ distinct planning frameworks. The profit sharing plan rollover is categorically different from both: it is a pre-tax employer-funded qualified plan with the NUA complication that no IRA-based rollover has, the vesting schedule consideration that no IRA-based rollover has, and the employer discretion dynamic that no employee-directed plan has.
Ensure you are receiving the absolute top rates
Current Fixed Annuity Rates
Compare today’s best fixed annuity rates from top carriers.
Current Bonus Annuity Rates
See which annuities offer the highest upfront bonus today.
Request an Annuity Quote
Submit our annuity request form to get personalized rate options.
Lifetime Income Calculator
Use our calculator to see how much guaranteed income your annuity can provide.
Before the Annuity Decision — Vesting Verification and the NUA Analysis
Two pre-rollover determinations are unique to profit sharing plans and must be completed before any annuity application is evaluated. Skipping either one can produce a rollover that either cannot be executed for the full expected amount (if vesting is overestimated) or that permanently forfeits a significant tax advantage (if the NUA strategy is bypassed when it should have been applied).
The vesting verification is the simpler of the two determinations. Profit sharing plan employer contributions are frequently subject to a vesting schedule — either cliff vesting (where zero percent is vested until a specified number of years of service, after which 100% vests at once) or graded vesting (where an increasing percentage of employer contributions vest each year over a multi-year schedule). The IRS requires that qualified plans vest no more slowly than either three-year cliff vesting or six-year graded vesting, but many plans vest faster. Only the vested portion of the profit sharing account balance is available for rollover at separation from service. A participant who separates before full vesting forfeits the unvested portion to the plan’s forfeiture account. Before initiating any annuity rollover, the participant must obtain their current vested balance from the plan administrator — not their total account balance, which may include unvested employer contributions — and confirm that the figure used for annuity product evaluation reflects the actual distributable amount rather than the account statement’s gross balance.
The NUA analysis is the more consequential determination. If the profit sharing plan holds employer stock — shares of the sponsoring company or its affiliates — the participant must evaluate whether taking a lump-sum distribution in-kind of the employer stock (rather than rolling it to an IRA) produces a better after-tax outcome. The NUA strategy, available under IRC Section 402(e)(4), works as follows: upon a qualifying lump-sum distribution of the entire plan balance within one tax year after a triggering event (separation from service, reaching age 59½, disability, or death), the participant can direct employer stock in-kind to a taxable brokerage account while rolling all other plan assets to a Traditional IRA. At distribution, the cost basis of the employer stock is taxed as ordinary income in the distribution year. The Net Unrealized Appreciation — the increase in the stock’s value from the date the employer purchased it for the plan to the date of distribution — is not taxed at distribution but is instead taxed at the more favorable long-term capital gains rate when the stock is eventually sold. Any additional appreciation from the distribution date to the eventual sale date is taxed as capital gains (long-term if held more than one year, short-term if sold within one year of distribution).
When NUA Makes Sense — and When Rolling to the Annuity Is the Better Path
| Factor | NUA Strategy Favored (Employer Stock In-Kind) | Full IRA Annuity Rollover Favored | Split Strategy (NUA + IRA Annuity) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Appreciation Level | High NUA relative to cost basis — the NUA is a large percentage of the stock’s total market value. The higher the NUA percentage, the greater the potential tax rate arbitrage between ordinary income (avoided) and long-term capital gains (applied). | Low NUA or low appreciation — the stock has not appreciated significantly inside the plan, meaning little or no tax rate advantage from the NUA treatment. The cost basis (taxable immediately at ordinary income) may represent most of the stock’s value. | Moderate NUA — some but not overwhelming appreciation. The employer stock goes in-kind to a brokerage account using NUA treatment; all mutual funds, stable value, and other non-stock plan assets roll to the IRA annuity directly. |
| Current Tax Bracket at Distribution | Low-to-moderate bracket in the distribution year — the cost basis taxed as ordinary income is a smaller immediate burden, and the long-term capital gains rate advantage on the NUA portion is preserved. Particularly compelling if the participant is in a year of lower income. | High bracket in the distribution year — the immediate ordinary income tax on the cost basis (triggered by the lump-sum distribution) produces a large tax bill in a year when the participant is already in a high bracket, offsetting the NUA rate advantage. | Moderate bracket — participant can absorb the ordinary income tax on the cost basis without undue bracket impact, while the NUA’s capital gains treatment on the appreciated portion produces meaningful long-term tax savings. |
| Time Horizon to Using the Assets | Short-to-medium time horizon — the participant plans to sell the employer stock relatively soon. The NUA benefit is realized on a shorter timeline, reducing the advantage that IRA tax deferral would have produced over a longer holding period. | Long time horizon — decades of IRA annuity tax deferral may compound to a larger after-tax outcome than the NUA’s immediate capital gains tax treatment on stock distributed today. The longer the period before the assets are needed, the more compelling the IRA option becomes. | Variable — the non-stock portion going to the IRA annuity has a longer growth horizon; the employer stock going in-kind can be held or sold independently based on concentration risk management and tax planning goals. |
| State Tax Treatment | States that honor federal long-term capital gains rates — the NUA benefit is fully preserved at the state level. This maximizes the total tax arbitrage between the NUA’s capital gains rate and ordinary income. States with no income tax or low capital gains rates are optimal. | States that tax capital gains as ordinary income (such as California at rates up to 13.3%) — the NUA’s federal tax advantage may be significantly or entirely offset by state-level capital gains taxation. The IRA annuity’s tax deferral may produce better net outcomes in these states. | State-by-state analysis required — the split strategy’s value depends on both the federal NUA advantage and the state’s treatment of both capital gains (on the NUA stock) and ordinary income (on future IRA annuity distributions). |
| Estate Planning Consideration | NUA is income in respect of a decedent (IRD) — does NOT receive a step-up in basis at death for the original NUA amount. Only post-distribution appreciation receives a potential step-up. Heirs will pay capital gains tax on the NUA portion regardless of when the stock is inherited. | IRA annuity passes to beneficiaries subject to the 10-year distribution rule and is fully taxable as ordinary income to beneficiaries. No step-up applies to IRA assets. For high-income heirs in top brackets, the IRA’s ordinary income character at inheritance may be costly. | Split strategy can optimize the estate planning outcome: IRA annuity to lowest-bracket beneficiaries or charitable beneficiaries (no income tax); NUA stock to beneficiaries with long time horizons who can hold and benefit from post-distribution appreciation’s step-up potential. |
Profit Sharing Plan Rollover Triggers — Why the Annuity Decision Is Often Made Under Time Pressure
Unlike an IRA — which the owner controls and can roll over at any time — a profit sharing plan participant cannot initiate a rollover until a qualifying distributable event occurs. The triggering events that make a profit sharing plan balance available for distribution and rollover are: separation from service (voluntary resignation, termination, or retirement); plan termination by the employer; reaching age 59½ (if the plan document permits in-service distributions at this age); or disability. Of these, the plan termination trigger is the most underappreciated and the one that most frequently places participants in an unfamiliar time-pressure situation. When an employer decides to terminate the profit sharing plan — which may happen in connection with a business sale, a corporate restructuring, a merger, or a management decision to replace the plan with a different retirement vehicle — all participants receive notice and have a specified period to elect a distribution or rollover. Participants who do not make an affirmative election typically receive a mandatory cashout (for small balances) or have the funds rolled to an IRA for them. The plan termination rollover gives participants less planning lead time than a voluntary separation rollover — and yet it is precisely the situation where the NUA analysis, the vesting verification, and the annuity product selection all need to be completed correctly and quickly. Understanding how annuity surrender schedules work — and selecting a product whose surrender period aligns with the participant’s realistic income timeline — is one of the decisions that plan termination rollovers frequently compress, with consequences that last for 7 or 10 years afterward.
MYGA After Profit Sharing Rollover — Declared-Rate Simplicity for the Non-Stock Portion
A Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuity is the most appropriate destination for profit sharing plan participants who want the non-stock portion of their rollover to lock in a competitive declared rate for a defined period without market exposure, crediting formula complexity, or annual performance uncertainty. For participants who are executing the split strategy — taking employer stock in-kind via NUA treatment and rolling everything else to a Traditional IRA — the non-stock portion typically consists of mutual funds, stable value, money market holdings, and other plan investments that have been liquidated or transferred in-kind to the IRA. A MYGA funded with this non-stock IRA balance provides the same principal guarantee and rate-lock efficiency as for any qualified plan rollover: the declared rate is locked for the full 2–10 year guarantee period, the full declared rate compounds without annual tax reduction, and the 10% annual free provision accommodates RMD obligations for participants who have reached the required beginning date. The MYGA laddering approach — splitting the non-stock rollover across 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year MYGA contracts simultaneously — creates staggered maturity dates that give the participant evaluation opportunities at each maturity without committing the full rollover to a single rate environment for the maximum term. The MYGA versus FIA comparison for the profit sharing rollover follows the same declared-rate-versus-indexed-range framework as for all pre-tax qualified plan rollovers — with the profit sharing plan’s specific balance profile and income timeline determining which structure produces better alignment.
FIA After Profit Sharing Rollover — Protected Growth for Long-Horizon Accumulation
A Fixed Indexed Annuity serves profit sharing plan participants whose rollover balance has a 7-or-more-year accumulation horizon before income is needed and who want principal protection alongside indexed growth potential. Many profit sharing plan participants are long-tenured employees who have accumulated meaningful balances through years of employer contributions in prosperous years — arriving at the rollover with an account built from the employer’s success rather than their own paycheck sacrifices. For these participants, the FIA’s 0% floor provides the specific protection against the sequence-of-returns risk that is most damaging in the years immediately surrounding retirement: if the FIA-funded portion of the profit sharing rollover encounters negative market years, the 0% floor prevents those years from eroding the accumulation that took the employer years to build. Our guide to choosing the correct indexes in an FIA provides the framework for selecting which crediting strategy best serves the profit sharing rollover’s accumulation profile. For a guaranteed growth annuity structure within the profit sharing rollover — a MYGA or FIA with fixed declared-rate characteristics — the specific guarantee period should be matched to the participant’s realistic income activation timeline rather than to the maximum guarantee length available. The profit sharing participant who terminates at 58 and wants to retire at 65 has a 7-year accumulation window; the participant who terminates at 62 and needs income within 3 years should be evaluating shorter-term MYGA structures, not 10-year FIAs.
Income Annuity After Profit Sharing Rollover — Converting Employer-Built Capital to Guaranteed Lifetime Income
For profit sharing plan participants at or near retirement whose primary objective is replacing active employment income with a guaranteed lifetime income stream, a SPIA or Deferred Income Annuity funded with the profit sharing rollover creates the pension-like income structure that many participants — particularly those at companies that moved from defined benefit pension plans to profit sharing plans — now lack. The employer who contributed discretionarily to the profit sharing plan was not providing a defined benefit pension; the participant’s income security in retirement depends on converting that accumulated defined contribution balance into defined income. A SPIA immediately activated, a DIA with a specified future income start date, or a FIA with a Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefit rider that activates on demand all accomplish this conversion — each with different flexibility and income timing characteristics. Our full resource on lifetime income annuity strategies covers the SPIA-versus-DIA-versus-GLWB framework comprehensively. For profit sharing plan participants evaluating the full spectrum of pension alternatives using annuities — specifically how an annuity funded with the profit sharing rollover compares to the defined benefit pension that was replaced or never existed — the income annuity comparison is the most direct tool for evaluating whether the converted balance produces sufficient guaranteed income alongside Social Security to cover essential retirement expenses. The mechanics of executing the rollover — direct trustee-to-trustee transfer from the profit sharing plan to a Traditional IRA, and from the IRA to the annuity — follow the same steps covered in our resource on how qualified plan rollovers to annuities work. Understanding these steps matters particularly for plan termination rollovers, where the timeline for executing the transfer may be compressed by the plan termination notice period.
Ready to compare annuity options for your profit sharing plan rollover?
Request Your Personalized Profit Sharing Rollover Analysis
Financial Protection Essentials
Explore disability coverage, life insurance, and specialty protection options for employees and working professionals across all industries.
Explore Annuity Rollover Options by Account Type
Every retirement account rolls over differently. Choose your plan type below to see the specific rules, tax treatment, and best annuity strategies for your situation.
Talk With an Advisor Today
Choose how you’d like to connect—call or message us, then book a time that works for you.
Schedule here:
calendly.com/jason-dibcompanies/diversified-quotes
Licensed in all 50 states • Fiduciary, family-owned since 1980
What are the exact conditions required to use the NUA strategy — and what disqualifies it?
The NUA strategy under IRC Section 402(e)(4) requires four conditions to be simultaneously satisfied, confirmed from IRS Topic 412 and Publication 575. First, a qualifying triggering event must have occurred: the participant must have separated from service, reached age 59½, become disabled (under IRS definitions), or died (allowing a beneficiary to use NUA). Second, the distribution must be a lump-sum distribution — the entire balance of all accounts of the same type from the same employer must be distributed within a single tax year. This is the most commonly missed condition: if a participant takes the employer stock in-kind but leaves mutual fund balances in the plan until the following year, the lump-sum distribution requirement is not met and the NUA treatment is disqualified. The full plan balance must be distributed in one calendar year (though the triggering event itself may have occurred in a prior year). Third, the employer stock must be distributed in-kind — transferred as actual shares of stock, not converted to cash first and then distributed. If the plan sells the stock and distributes cash, the NUA rules do not apply; only in-kind distribution of the actual shares preserves the NUA treatment. Fourth, the plan holding the employer stock must be a qualified plan — a profit sharing plan, 401(k), pension plan, or stock bonus plan. IRA-based plans (including SEP IRAs and SIMPLE IRAs) are not eligible for NUA treatment. Once employer stock has been rolled to an IRA, it can never subsequently qualify for NUA treatment — the opportunity is permanently lost. A common disqualifier: a plan that previously rolled employer stock to an IRA during a partial rollover in a prior year cannot subsequently apply NUA to that same stock. The NUA analysis must be completed and acted upon at the triggering event — it cannot be reversed or applied retroactively. Understanding how the non-stock portion of the profit sharing rollover is taxed when it goes to a Traditional IRA annuity — ordinary income on all distributions, RMDs beginning at the required beginning date, LIFO rules on partial withdrawals — provides the complete tax picture for the split strategy where employer stock goes in-kind and the remaining balance rolls to the annuity.
How do vesting schedules affect the rollable balance — and what happens to the unvested portion?
Profit sharing plan vesting schedules determine which portion of the employer contribution balance the participant actually owns and can roll over upon separation from service. The IRS permits two maximum vesting schedules for profit sharing plans: cliff vesting (where 0% is vested until a specified number of years of service, after which 100% vests immediately — the IRS requires no more than three-year cliff vesting for most plans) and graded vesting (where an increasing percentage vests each year over a schedule — the IRS requires no faster than six-year graded vesting for most plans, with at least 20% vesting after year two, increasing by 20% per year through year six). Many plans vest faster — some vest immediately — but the participant cannot assume full vesting without verifying with the plan administrator. When a participant separates from service before full vesting is achieved, the unvested portion is forfeited to the plan’s forfeiture account. Those forfeited amounts are then used to reduce future employer contributions or reallocated among remaining participants according to the plan document’s forfeiture allocation provisions. The participant who has forfeited unvested contributions cannot recover those funds through any IRA or annuity structure — they are permanently gone. The vested balance is the only amount available for rollover. The practical implication for annuity planning: the annuity carrier must receive the correct vested balance figure at application — not the gross account statement balance, which may include unvested amounts. Requesting a current vested balance statement from the plan administrator before any annuity application is submitted prevents the common error of planning for a rollover amount that is larger than what will actually be available to transfer. For plan termination rollovers specifically, the triggering event of plan termination typically results in full vesting of all participants — a plan termination generally accelerates vesting to 100%, allowing all participants to roll over their complete account balances regardless of where they were in the vesting schedule. Understanding how the resulting annuity’s free withdrawal provisions interact with RMDs on the verified vested balance is the final pre-commitment step before the annuity application is finalized.
How does the profit sharing plan rollover compare to a 401(k), 403(b), or pension rollover for annuity planning purposes?
The profit sharing plan rollover shares the same basic annuity evaluation framework as a 401(k) rollover — MYGA for declared-rate certainty, FIA for protected growth, SPIA/DIA for guaranteed income — but differs in three dimensions that affect how the evaluation proceeds. First, the NUA dimension: 401(k) plans can also hold employer stock eligible for NUA treatment, but many 401(k) plans invest primarily in mutual funds without employer stock. The profit sharing plan — particularly for long-tenured employees of closely held or publicly traded companies that contributed employer stock through the plan — may have a substantial employer stock position that demands NUA analysis before any rollover decision is made. A 403(b) plan typically cannot hold employer stock (403(b) plans invest in annuities or mutual funds); a pension plan typically does not distribute employer stock in the NUA context. The profit sharing plan is the plan type most likely to present a meaningful NUA opportunity alongside the IRA annuity decision. Second, the vesting dimension: while both 401(k) and profit sharing plans use vesting schedules for employer contributions, profit sharing plans with discretionary annual contributions may have more variable vesting patterns — a participant who started recently may have a different vested percentage than a tenured employee even when both appear on the same account statement. Third, the contribution pattern: the profit sharing plan’s discretionary contribution history means the balance reflects the employer’s annual profitability rather than the participant’s consistent savings behavior. Our resource on what to do with a 401(k) after retirement covers the standard qualified plan rollover framework that applies to profit sharing plans after the NUA and vesting determinations are complete. Whether annuities are a good investment for the profit sharing rollover requires the same evaluation framework as any pre-tax qualified plan: comparing the annuity’s guaranteed growth, principal protection, or income certainty against the alternative of a self-directed Traditional IRA maintaining market exposure — with the specific balance size, income timeline, and tax situation of the individual participant determining which structure produces better long-term retirement security.
Can I use SEPPs from a profit sharing plan rollover annuity before age 59½?
Understanding how SEPPs apply to the profit sharing plan rollover annuity follows the same 72(t) framework as any Traditional IRA — because the profit sharing plan balance, once rolled to a Traditional IRA, is governed entirely by IRA distribution rules. Before the rollover, the profit sharing plan itself offers a potential early distribution advantage that the IRA does not: under the Rule of 55, participants who separate from service at age 55 or older can take distributions from the plan directly without the 10% early distribution penalty — this exception applies to the employer plan itself, not to an IRA. Once the profit sharing plan balance is rolled to a Traditional IRA, the Rule of 55 exception is permanently lost; only the 72(t) SEPP framework remains available for penalty-free distributions before age 59½. The SEPP election, once made on the Traditional IRA annuity, must continue for the longer of 5 years or until age 59½. Any modification before the continuation period ends retroactively reinstates all 10% penalties plus interest on every prior distribution. The annuity’s free withdrawal provision — typically 10% annually — must accommodate the SEPP payment amount without triggering surrender charges; the SEPP exempts the distribution from the IRS 10% penalty but does not exempt it from the carrier’s contractual surrender charge schedule. For profit sharing plan participants who are between 55 and 59½ and want penalty-free distributions, evaluating whether to take distributions directly from the plan (using the Rule of 55) before rolling the balance to an IRA annuity may be preferable to rolling immediately and relying on a SEPP. This is one of the few planning scenarios where delaying the rollover to a Traditional IRA — and continuing to take distributions from the employer plan under the Rule of 55 — is better than rolling immediately. Understanding how RMDs under SECURE 2.0 apply to the Traditional IRA annuity after the rollover is the parallel distribution planning consideration for participants approaching RMD age on the other end of the timeline.
How does the profit sharing rollover annuity fit within the companion pages in this rollover series?
The rollover series covered in our guides spans the full range of qualified retirement account types: the SIMPLE IRA rollover with its 2-year waiting period and 25% penalty, the Solo 401(k) rollover with its Form 5500-EZ and loan payoff requirements, and the Roth IRA rollover with its tax-free income dimension. The profit sharing plan rollover occupies a unique position in this series as the only plan type where the employer stock NUA analysis must precede the annuity product decision. Every other plan type in the series — whether the SIMPLE IRA, TSP, SEP IRA, or Roth IRA — routes 100% of the rollable balance to the IRA destination without the split-strategy complication that NUA introduces. For participants who have navigated a profit sharing plan rollover alongside rollovers from other plan types — many long-tenured employees simultaneously have a 401(k) balance, a profit sharing account, and an IRA from prior employer plans — the NUA analysis applies only to plans holding employer securities (profit sharing plans and 401(k)s). IRA balances cannot benefit from NUA treatment, and SEP IRA and SIMPLE IRA balances cannot either. Keeping track of which account holds employer stock eligible for NUA and which accounts should roll directly to the IRA annuity is the organizational framework for a multi-account rollover that includes a profit sharing component. For the non-stock portion of any profit sharing plan rollover, the annuity evaluation follows the same framework as any qualified pre-tax plan rollover: the MYGA for declared-rate certainty, the FIA for protected growth, and the income annuity for longevity protection — and the decision among these hinges on the same planning dimensions that govern every rollover in the series: the participant’s income timeline, risk tolerance, tax bracket, estate planning objectives, and retirement income target.
About the Author:
Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA and Chief Underwriter at Diversified Insurance Brokers (NPN 20471358), is a senior insurance and retirement professional with more than 25 years of real-world experience helping individuals, families, and business owners protect their income, assets, and long-term financial stability. As a long-time partner of the nationally licensed independent agency Diversified Insurance Brokers, Jason provides trusted guidance across multiple specialties—including fixed and indexed annuities, long-term care planning, personal and business disability insurance, life insurance solutions, Group Health, Travel Medical and Evacuation Insurance, and short-term health coverage. Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains active contracts with over 100 highly rated insurance carriers, ensuring clients have access to a broad and competitive marketplace.
His practical, education-first approach has earned recognition in publications such as VoyageATL, and contributions from his agency featured in Kiplinger and GoBankingRates— highlighting his commitment to financial clarity and client-focused planning. Drawing on deep product knowledge and years of hands-on field experience, Jason helps clients evaluate carriers, compare strategies, and build retirement and protection plans that are both secure and cost-efficient. Visitors who want to explore current annuity rates and compare options across multiple insurers can also use this annuity quote and comparison tool.
Explore More Lifetime Income Options: Browse our complete guide to How to Transfer a Retirement Account to an Annuity — covering IRA, 401k, 403b, TSP, pension, Roth IRA, SEP IRA, 457b & more rollover guides from 100+ carriers.
Last Reviewed: July 6, 2026 |
Reviewed by: Jason Stolz, CLTC, CRPC, DIA, CAA
Chief Underwriter, Diversified Insurance Brokers, Inc. | NPN: 20471358 | Licensed in all 50 states
Editorial Standards: Diversified Insurance Brokers maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure accuracy, clarity, and independence in all content. Learn more about our editorial standards and commitment to transparency.
