Is Group Health Insurance Worth It

“Is group health insurance worth it?” is really two questions wearing one trench coat. The first — should a business offer health coverage at all — has a fairly settled answer for most employers: yes, for recruitment, for retention, and for the tax treatment that makes it one of the most efficient forms of compensation a company can offer. The second question is the one that actually determines whether the coverage you end up with is a good deal or a mediocre one, and it’s the one almost nobody asks explicitly: worth it, funded which way? At Diversified Insurance Brokers, we place group health coverage across dozens of carriers and funding structures, and for a large share of small and midsize employers we work with, the honest answer to “which structure is worth it” is level-funded — not because it’s trendy, but because of how it’s actually built. This page walks through exactly how level-funded coverage works, why it can genuinely outperform traditional fully insured plans for the right group, where it isn’t the right answer, and why the structure you choose deserves the same scrutiny as the carrier and the plan design.

Wondering whether level-funded coverage would actually save your business money? Let’s run your group’s real numbers.
Talk to a Group Health Specialist

For the majority of small and midsize employers with a reasonably healthy, stable workforce, level-funded coverage wins on the dimensions that matter most day to day: predictable cash flow, a real shot at getting money back, catastrophic protection that’s already built into the structure, and visibility into what’s actually driving costs. It isn’t the right answer for every group, and we’ll cover exactly where it isn’t further down this page — but it’s the structure worth evaluating first for most of the businesses we work with, and the rest of this page explains precisely why, and it should be noted that United Healthcare released a study showing that this type of plan saves employers an average of 22% on company healthcare costs.

Why the Funding Structure Matters More Than the Carrier Logo

Group health costs have been climbing steadily enough that most employers already feel it without needing a statistic to confirm it — but the numbers put real weight behind that feeling. Average employer-sponsored coverage cost roughly $17,500 per employee in 2025, and that figure is expected to climb past $18,500 in 2026. Small-group premium increases have been running in the double digits in many states heading into this year. Against that backdrop, the question of how your coverage is funded — not just which carrier’s name is on the card — has become one of the more consequential decisions a growing business makes, because the funding structure determines whether rising costs get smoothed across a broad pool or reflect your specific group’s actual experience, and whether a good year ever puts money back in your pocket.

What Level-Funded Coverage Actually Is

Level-funded health insurance is a hybrid structure, and understanding exactly how the hybrid is built is what makes the rest of this page make sense. Legally, a level-funded plan is a self-funded plan under ERISA — your business, not an insurance carrier, is technically responsible for paying your employees’ medical claims. But instead of experiencing that responsibility as unpredictable monthly bills the way traditional self-funding does, you pay one fixed amount every month, just like a traditional insurance premium.

That fixed monthly payment is actually three things bundled together: a funded account sized to cover your group’s projected claims for the year, an administrative fee covering plan management and network access, and a stop-loss insurance premium. The stop-loss insurance is what makes the whole arrangement work for a business too small to comfortably absorb a catastrophic claim on its own — it caps your exposure in two directions at once. Specific stop-loss caps how much any single employee’s claims can cost your plan before insurance takes over. Aggregate stop-loss caps your total claims exposure across the whole group for the year. Between the two, a level-funded employer gets most of the predictability of fully insured coverage with almost none of the catastrophic downside of true self-funding.

Then comes the part that makes this structure genuinely attractive rather than merely defensible: if your group’s actual claims come in under what was projected for the year, you generally get some or all of that unused claims fund back. A fully insured plan never does this — every dollar of premium you paid stays with the carrier regardless of how little your employees used the plan. Under a level-funded arrangement, a healthy year is a year you can actually see reflected in your bottom line, not just in your employees’ well-being. Our deeper look at whether small groups can actually get health insurance refunds and our full explanation of how stop-loss insurance works inside a level-funded plan cover both of these mechanics in more depth.

The Real Reason Level-Funded Can Cost Less: The ACA Rating Exemption

This is the single most important thing to understand about why level-funded coverage exists and why it’s grown so quickly, and it comes down to one structural fact most employers have never had explained to them clearly.

Fully insured small-group plans are governed by ACA community rating rules. In practice, that means a carrier pricing a fully insured small-group plan generally cannot use your specific employees’ health history to set your rate — pricing is based on broad factors like age, location, and group size, with every group in a similar profile paying roughly the same amount within that community pool. That’s a genuinely valuable protection for a group with significant health needs, because it means your rate isn’t determined by your own claims experience. But it also means a young, healthy workforce is, in effect, subsidizing less healthy groups within the same rated pool — you’re paying a rate calculated for the average of your risk category, not for your specific group’s actual, lower-than-average risk.

Level-funded plans sit outside those community rating rules, because legally they’re a form of self-funded coverage rather than fully insured coverage. That means a carrier evaluating a level-funded quote can, and typically does, medically underwrite the group — reviewing health questionnaires, prescription drug utilization, and prior claims experience before pricing the plan. For a healthy group, this is exactly the mechanism that produces real savings: you’re being priced on your own group’s actual risk instead of a broader community average that includes less healthy groups. Reported industry results reflect this directly — one major national carrier has reported that employers moving from fully insured to level-funded coverage paid meaningfully less on average, with figures in the range of twenty percent lower premium reported in some analyses. Results vary considerably by group, and any specific number should be treated as illustrative rather than a promise — but the directional advantage for a healthy group is well documented and consistent across the market.

Where Level-Funded Isn’t the Right Answer

Being straightforward about the limits of level-funded coverage is exactly what separates a genuine recommendation from a sales pitch, and there are real situations where a different structure serves a business better.

Level-funded plans are not guaranteed issue. Because the carrier is underwriting your group’s actual health, a workforce with several employees managing expensive chronic conditions — ongoing cancer treatment, dialysis, certain specialty medications — may receive a quote that’s less favorable than the community-rated fully insured alternative, or in some cases may not be offered coverage at all. For a group in that position, fully insured coverage’s community-rating protection is doing exactly the job it’s designed to do, and it may genuinely be the better and even the only workable option.

Renewal can be more volatile. Because a level-funded renewal is priced off your own group’s prior-year claims rather than smoothed across a carrier’s entire community pool, a single difficult claims year — an unexpected major diagnosis, a high-cost NICU stay — can produce a substantially higher renewal than a comparable fully insured plan would see in the same situation. This is the trade-off working exactly as designed, not a flaw, but it’s worth anticipating rather than discovering for the first time at renewal.

Availability varies by state. A handful of states restrict or effectively prohibit level-funded arrangements for small groups through their stop-loss insurance regulations, which means employers in those states remain in the community-rated fully insured market by default. Confirming availability in your specific state before assuming this option is on the table is a necessary first step.

Very small groups can lose access to state continuation coverage. Many state continuation laws — sometimes called mini-COBRA — apply only to fully insured plans. If your business is small enough to fall outside federal COBRA requirements and you move to a level-funded plan, departing employees may lose access to continuation coverage they would otherwise have had. This is a genuinely easy detail to miss, and it’s exactly the kind of thing worth confirming before making the switch rather than after.

Not sure which side of this your business falls on? We’ll tell you honestly, before you commit to either structure.
Get an Honest Funding Assessment

Level-Funded vs. Traditional Self-Funding

It’s worth distinguishing level-funded from full traditional self-funding as well, since the two are related but genuinely different commitments. Traditional self-funding — where a large employer pays actual claims as they occur through a third-party administrator, arranging its own stop-loss coverage separately — generally makes the most sense once a business has enough employees, typically upward of a hundred, to statistically smooth out claims volatility on its own. Below that scale, the built-in, carrier-packaged stop-loss protection inside a level-funded structure does the same essential job without requiring the business to design and manage that protection itself. Our overview of what self-funded group health insurance actually means and our honest look at the pros and cons of self-funding cover this comparison directly, including where the crossover point tends to fall.

The Tax Picture Doesn’t Change — And That’s a Good Thing

One question we hear regularly: does switching to level-funded coverage put any of the standard tax advantages of employer-sponsored health coverage at risk? It doesn’t. Employer contributions toward group health coverage remain deductible as a business expense, and employees continue to receive the coverage on a pre-tax basis, regardless of which funding structure sits underneath the plan. The tax treatment follows the fact that you’re offering group health coverage at all, not the specific mechanism funding it. Our detailed breakdown of level-funded health insurance tax benefits covers this in full, including how it interacts with contribution requirements — our overview of minimum employer contribution requirements is worth reading alongside it if you’re setting up a plan for the first time.

Why This Decision Deserves an Independent Broker, Not a Single Carrier’s Pitch

Here’s something worth understanding about how this decision typically gets made badly: a captive agent or a single carrier’s sales representative can only show you what that one carrier sells. If their company’s strength is fully insured plans, that’s what you’ll be shown, regardless of whether your group would actually be better served by a level-funded structure. If their company pushes level-funded aggressively because the commission structure favors it, that’s what you’ll hear pitched — even for a group whose health profile makes fully insured community rating the smarter, safer choice.

The only way to actually know which structure wins for your specific group is to run both quotes side by side — a genuine fully insured, community-rated quote and a genuine level-funded, medically underwritten quote — and compare the real numbers rather than a generic argument for either one. That comparison is exactly what an independent broker who represents both fully insured and level-funded carriers can do, and it’s precisely why this decision shouldn’t be made based on a single carrier’s presentation. Our overview of why an independent group health broker matters covers this principle in more depth, and it’s the entire premise behind how we approach every group health case we take on.

How We Help

We start every group health conversation the same way: by understanding your workforce’s actual profile — size, general health picture, turnover, and what you’re currently paying — before recommending any specific structure. For groups that look like strong candidates for level-funded coverage, we run real medical underwriting alongside a genuine fully insured quote so you can see the actual dollar difference, not a theoretical one. For groups where the health profile suggests fully insured community rating is the safer, more cost-effective path, we’ll tell you that plainly, even though it’s the less exciting recommendation.

Because we represent carriers across both funding structures rather than being tied to one company’s product line, our recommendation reflects what actually fits your group — not which structure happens to be easiest for us to sell. Our guidance on choosing the right group health plan and getting the best group health rates reflects that same approach, and if you already have coverage in place and want an honest second look at whether it’s still the right structure for your current workforce, our second-opinion review is exactly built for that conversation.

Ready to see the real numbers for your business — fully insured and level-funded, side by side?
Get Your Group Health Comparison